Summary: base: Add timer tool to osaf_time and base/time
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2090
Peer Reviewer(s): [email protected], [email protected]
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): 5.1.x and devel
Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        y
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
Note: Needs to be pushed to 5.1.x branch. One reason is that it is needed
for fixing #2066

changeset 9208385604cb45dce4ee272f20143963e6140f75
Author: Lennart Lund <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:49:34 +0200

        base: Add timer tool to osaf_time and base/time [#2090]

        Create functions primary for handling timeout of loops and add to 
osaf_time.
        C++ wrapper class is added to time.h in cplusplus/base


Added Files:
------------
 osaf/libs/core/common/tests/osaf_millis_timeout_test.cc


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/libs/core/common/include/osaf_time.h               |   51 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
 osaf/libs/core/common/tests/Makefile.am                 |    1 +
 osaf/libs/core/common/tests/osaf_millis_timeout_test.cc |  170 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/time.h                    |   35 
+++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
 <<LIST THE COMMAND LINE TOOLS/STEPS TO TEST YOUR CHANGES>>


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
 <<PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS>>


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>>


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to