Hi Ramesh!

Did you get a chance to look at this yet?

regards,

Anders Widell


On 10/10/2016 04:54 PM, Anders Widell wrote:
> Summary: base: Add classes for UNIX socket operations and log message 
> formatting [#2064]
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 2064
> Peer Reviewer(s): Ramesh
> Pull request to:
> Affected branch(es): default(5.2)
> Development branch: default
>
> --------------------------------
> Impacted area       Impact y/n
> --------------------------------
>   Docs                    n
>   Build system            n
>   RPM/packaging           n
>   Configuration files     n
>   Startup scripts         n
>   SAF services            n
>   OpenSAF services        n
>   Core libraries          y
>   Samples                 n
>   Tests                   n
>   Other                   n
>
>
> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
> ---------------------------------------------
> v2:
>
> * Fix bugs in time stamp formatting (wrong seconds, missing validation
>    of input parameters)
> * Added a few more test cases for time stamp formatting
>
> changeset ea286178e02720d7d8859d4eabfbed785f48321a
> Author:       Anders Widell <anders.wid...@ericsson.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:50:15 +0200
>
>       base: Add classes for UNIX socket operations and log message formatting
>       [#2064]
>
>       Add support classes for using UNIX sockets, and for formatting log 
> messages
>       according to rfc5424.
>
>
> Complete diffstat:
> ------------------
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/Makefile.am               |   13 ++++++++-
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/buffer.h                  |  100 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/log_message.cc            |  130 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/log_message.h             |  186 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/tests/Makefile.am         |   12 +++++---
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/tests/log_message_test.cc |  150 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/unix_client_socket.cc     |   52 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/unix_client_socket.h      |   41 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/unix_server_socket.cc     |   51 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/unix_server_socket.h      |   42 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/unix_socket.cc            |   58 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   osaf/libs/core/cplusplus/base/unix_socket.h             |   89 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   12 files changed, 917 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>
> Testing Commands:
> -----------------
> make check
>
>
> Testing, Expected Results:
> --------------------------
> All unit tests should pass
>
>
> Conditions of Submission:
> -------------------------
> Ack from reviewer(s)
>
>
> Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
> -------------------------------------------
> mips        n          n
> mips64      n          n
> x86         n          n
> x86_64      y          y
> powerpc     n          n
> powerpc64   n          n
>
>
> Reviewer Checklist:
> -------------------
> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
>
>
> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>
> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
>      that need proper data filled in.
>
> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
>
> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>
> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>
> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
>
> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
>
> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
>      (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>
> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
>      Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>
> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
>
> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
>      like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>
> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
>      cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
>
> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
>      too much content into a single commit.
>
> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
>
> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
>      Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
>
> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
>      commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>
> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
>      of what has changed between each re-send.
>
> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
>      comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
>
> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
>
> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
>      the threaded patch review.
>
> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
>      for in-service upgradability test.
>
> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
>      do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Opensaf-devel mailing list
> Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to