Summary: amfd: do not spawn multiple threads for imm init[#2188] 
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2188 
Peer Reviewer(s): AMF devs 
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): ALL 
Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset 4f0018d4813645d9cc7ff86cc59ae4969c205bf1
Author: Praveen Malviya <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:19:30 +0530

        amfd: do not spawn multiple threads for imm init[#2188]

        When AMFD receives BAD_HANDLE from IMM, it calls avd_imm_reinit_bg() to 
init
        with IMM in a separate thread. After this if again main thread tries to
        execute some job for IMM update, IMM will return BAD_HANDLE and AMFD 
will
        again call avd_imm_reinit_bg() to init with IMM. This can happen when 
AMFD
        tries to update IMM in job queues.

        Patch fixes this problem. Also if avd_saImmOiRtObjectUpdate_sync() fails
        with BAD_HANDLE, update will be pushed in jon queue to be updated later.


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/imm.cc       |  16 +++++++++++-----
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/cb.h |   6 ++++++
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/main.cc      |   2 ++
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Not tested.
Patch is generated based on code analysis and logs.

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from Gary, Minh and Nagendra.

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to