Summary: clm: Send MDS messages asynchronously to avoid blocking the main thread [#2220] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 2220 Peer Reviewer(s): Mathi Pull request to: Affected branch(es): default(5.2) Development branch: default
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- changeset 332a1f2c0cd03e60b8826d0e5935ae6c643fe0fe Author: Anders Widell <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 13:35:52 +0100 clm: Send MDS messages asynchronously to avoid blocking the main thread [#2220] Send the join request message asynchronously to the CLM server. This avoids blocking the CLM main thread for a potentially very long time in case no reply is received (e.g. because of message loss or because the CLM server died before being able to send the reply). The result is a faster recovery from such error scenarios. Complete diffstat: ------------------ osaf/services/saf/clmsv/nodeagent/cb.h | 1 + osaf/services/saf/clmsv/nodeagent/evt.h | 22 +++++++++++++--- osaf/services/saf/clmsv/nodeagent/main.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- Inject a fault that causes the join request from the standby SC to be lost, e.g. by killing the active SC before it can send the reply. Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- The standby should become active. Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- Ack from reviewer(s) Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
