Summary:imm: return TRY_AGAIN when RepositoryInit mode is chaged to file, during the CCB PBE disable processing [#2229] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 2229 Peer Reviewer(s): Zoran, Hung Affected branch(es):5.2 Development branch: 5.2
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- changeset 77ba54f970f32adaaf724d978f86dc870fa446d8 Author: Neelakanta Reddy <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:56:33 +0530 imm: return TRY_AGAIN when RepositoryInit mode is chaged to file, during the CCB PBE disable processing [#2229] TRY_AGAIN will be returned to the ccbApply when the saImmRepositoryInit is changed from SA_IMM_KEEP_REPOSITORY to SA_IMM_INIT_FROM_FILE. The duration of the TRY_AGAIN is from the time ccb upcall is sent to PBE to receiving ACK from the PBE for the repository change CCB. Complete diffstat: ------------------ osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.cc | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.hh | 3 ++- osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/immnd_cb.h | 3 +++ osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/immnd_evt.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- As explained in decription of ticket Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- TRY_AGAIN will be returned during the CCB PBE disable processing. Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- Ack from Reviewers Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
