Ack

Regards, Vu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Canh Van Truong [mailto:canh.v.tru...@dektech.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 1:49 PM
> To: lennart.l...@ericsson.com; vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au;
> mahesh.va...@oracle.com
> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for log: implement
> SaLogFilterSetCallbackT and version handling V4 [#2146]
> 
> Summary: log: implement SaLogFilterSetCallbackT and version handling V4
> [#2146]
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2146
> Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart, Vu, Mahesh
> Pull request to: Vu
> Affected branch(es): default
> Development branch: default
> 
> --------------------------------
> Impacted area       Impact y/n
> --------------------------------
>  Docs                    n
>  Build system            n
>  RPM/packaging           n
>  Configuration files     n
>  Startup scripts         n
>  SAF services            n
>  OpenSAF services        y
>  Core libraries          n
>  Samples                 n
>  Tests                   n
>  Other                   n
> 
> 
> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
> ---------------------------------------------
>  <<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>>
> 
> changeset 05726400fc1a27cf50255b70bb7f952156cbe68f
> Author:       Canh Van Truong <canh.v.tru...@dektech.com.au>
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 17:19:56 +0700
> 
>       log: implement SaLogFilterSetCallbackT [#2146]
> 
>       Implement SaLogFilterSetCallbackT which is mentioned at section
> 3.6.5
>       SaLogFilterSetCallbackT @ AIS LOG document.
> 
>       LGS:
>            - Whenever severity filter is changed for app and systerm
streams,
> lgs will
>       find which clients that associate with the stream. Then lgs sends
> message
>       callback to clients.
>            - Encoding callback message for severity filter callback
> 
>       LGA:
>            - Decoding callback message for severity callback from lgs and
> send the
>       message to the client which setting filter callback.
>            - Dispatching severity filter callback
> 
>       - Encrease version of log service to A.02.03
> 
> changeset 8d41edf85334f1b14d858e2ad2f705aecf6b9a68
> Author:       Canh Van Truong <canh.v.tru...@dektech.com.au>
> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:24:33 +0700
> 
>       log: Add minor version checking in log server [#2146]
> 
>       Checking minor version and return version error if major/minor
> version is
>       higher than supported major/minor
> 
>       Add client_version to log_client_t and checkpoint struct in lgs
> 
>       Increase checkpoint version and checkpoint client_ver to stand by
> 
>       Only send filter callback to client that initialized with minor
version >
> 3
> 
> changeset ff130149eb45136a50563878431a92b52e024997
> Author:       Canh Van Truong <canh.v.tru...@dektech.com.au>
> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:42:40 +0700
> 
>       log: fix checking version in log agent [#2146]
> 
>       Fix checking version in log agent
> 
>       The agent report highest supported version except getting
> ERR_VERSION from
>       server. if agent get ERR_VERSION, it will set supported version to
> A.02.03
> 
> 
> Added Files:
> ------------
>  src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v6.cc
>  src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v6.h
> 
> 
> Complete diffstat:
> ------------------
>  src/log/Makefile.am                           |    3 +
>  src/log/agent/lga.h                           |    4 +
>  src/log/agent/lga_api.c                       |   58 +++++++++++++++--
>  src/log/agent/lga_mds.c                       |   71
++++++++++++++++++++++
>  src/log/agent/lga_util.c                      |   64 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  src/log/apitest/logtest.c                     |    3 +-
>  src/log/apitest/logtestfr.c                   |    3 +-
>  src/log/apitest/saflogtest.c                  |    3 +-
>  src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c                |   72
++++++++++++++++++++++
>  src/log/apitest/tet_log_longDN.c              |    3 +-
>  src/log/apitest/tet_saLogFilterSetCallbackT.c |  418
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++-
>  src/log/apitest/tet_saLogInitialize.c         |   24 +++++++
>  src/log/apitest/tet_saLogStreamOpen_2.c       |    3 +-
>  src/log/common/lgsv_defs.h                    |    7 +-
>  src/log/common/lgsv_msg.h                     |    8 ++
>  src/log/logd/lgs_cb.h                         |    2 +
>  src/log/logd/lgs_evt.cc                       |   93
++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  src/log/logd/lgs_imm.cc                       |    8 ++
>  src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc                     |  181
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.h                      |    9 ++-
>  src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v6.cc                  |  169
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v6.h                   |   56 +++++++++++++++++
>  src/log/logd/lgs_mds.cc                       |   58 ++++++++++++------
>  src/log/logd/lgs_util.cc                      |   96
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  src/log/logd/lgs_util.h                       |    3 +
>  src/log/tools/saf_logger.c                    |    3 +-
>  src/osaf/saflog/saflog.c                      |    5 +-
>  27 files changed, 1308 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> Testing Commands:
> -----------------
> Create test cases:
> logtest 1 10
> logtest 1 11
> logtest 4 58
> logtest 17
> 
> 
> Testing, Expected Results:
> --------------------------
> All test cases pass
> 
> 
> Conditions of Submission:
> -------------------------
> Ack from reviewers
> 
> 
> Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
> -------------------------------------------
> mips        n          n
> mips64      n          n
> x86         n          n
> x86_64      n          n
> powerpc     n          n
> powerpc64   n          n
> 
> 
> Reviewer Checklist:
> -------------------
> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
> 
> 
> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
> 
> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank
entries
>     that need proper data filled in.
> 
> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
> 
> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
> 
> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
> 
> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your
> headers/comments/text.
> 
> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
> 
> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
>     (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
> 
> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
>     Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
> 
> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
> 
> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
>     like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
> 
> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
>     cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
> 
> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
>     too much content into a single commit.
> 
> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
> 
> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
>     Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
> 
> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
>     commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
> 
> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
>     of what has changed between each re-send.
> 
> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
>     comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
> 
> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
> 
> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
>     the threaded patch review.
> 
> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
>     for in-service upgradability test.
> 
> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
>     do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to