Hi Vu,
On 2/22/2017 11:52 AM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi Mahesh, > > Have a code fault in uml test, and other one in checkpoint. [AVM] This is Normal Suse 11 VM ( not UML). > I have just updated the code. Please re-apply for #3 and #4 patches. [AVM] is these new patch has function changes or only test code changes ? > > Note that, test case #14 of suite 17 should be run on active node, otherwise > getting failed. [AVM] Segmentation fault of /usr/bin/logtest Not a big issue , we need to debug why osaflogd core dumped and it is critical > I will put condition check to that test case later. -AVM > > Regards, Vu > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: A V Mahesh [mailto:mahesh.va...@oracle.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 12:16 PM >> To: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au>; >> lennart.l...@ericsson.com; canh.v.tru...@dektech.com.au >> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for log: add alternative >> destinations of log records [#2258] V4 >> >> Hi Vu, >> >> Thanks , >> >> While testing /usr/bin/logtest , SC-2 standby osaflogd core dumped and >> /usr/bin/logtest on SC-1 Active >> got Segmentation fault , am I missing any other patch ( i am using >> devel published patch only ) >> >> Following patches i am using : >> >> 1) #2293 (sent by Anders Widel, but not yet pushed) >> 2) #2258 (v2, sent by Lennart, but not yet pushed yet) >> 3) #2258 (v4, sent by Vu, but not yet pushed yet) >> >> ============================================================== >> ======================================== >> >> >> Core was generated by `/usr/lib64/opensaf/osaflogd'. >> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. >> #0 ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*) () at >> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:2195 >> 2195 src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc: No such file or directory. >> in src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc >> (gdb) bt >> #0 ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*) () at >> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:2195 >> #1 0x00007f12c3e22960 in ckpt_decode_log_struct(lgs_cb*, >> ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*, void*, void*, unsigned int (*)(edu_hdl_tag*, >> edu_tkn_tag*, void*, unsigned int*, edu_buf_env_tag*, EDP_OP_TYPE, >> EDU_ERR*)) () at src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:950 >> #2 0x00007f12c3e240dc in ckpt_decode_async_update(lgs_cb*, >> ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*) () at src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:1086 >> #3 0x00007f12c3e26941 in mbcsv_callback(ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*) () at >> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:880 >> #4 0x00007f12c2f25596 in ncs_mbscv_rcv_decode () from >> /usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0 >> #5 0x00007f12c2f25766 in ncs_mbcsv_rcv_async_update () from >> /usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0 >> #6 0x00007f12c2f2c370 in mbcsv_process_events () from >> /usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0 >> #7 0x00007f12c2f2c4db in mbcsv_hdl_dispatch_all () from >> /usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0 >> #8 0x00007f12c2f26ce2 in mbcsv_process_dispatch_request () at >> src/mbc/mbcsv_api.c:423 >> #9 0x00007f12c3e2396e in lgs_mbcsv_dispatch(unsigned int) () at >> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:327 >> #10 0x00007f12c3e009f2 in main () at src/log/logd/lgs_main.cc:583 >> (gdb) >> >> ============================================================== >> ======================================== >> >> Feb 22 10:37:06 SC-1 osafimmnd[4020]: NO Invalid error reported >> implementer 'safLogService', Ccb 161 will be aborted >> Feb 22 10:37:06 SC-1 osafimmnd[4020]: NO Ccb 161 aborted in COMPLETED >> processing (validation) >> Feb 22 10:37:06 SC-1 osafimmnd[4020]: NO Ccb 161 ABORTED (immcfg_SC- >> 1_5394) >> Add values Fail >> >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >> 0x000055555556929a in read_and_compare.isra.7 () at >> src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c:1891 >> 1891 src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c: No such file or directory. >> in src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c >> (gdb) Feb 22 10:37:07 SC-1 sshd[5298]: Accepted keyboard-interactive/pam >> for root from 10.176.178.22 port 51945 ssh2 >> bt >> #0 0x000055555556929a in read_and_compare.isra.7 () at >> src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c:1891 >> #1 0x0000555555569bbb in >> check_logRecordDestinationConfigurationEmpty >> () at src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c:2179 >> #2 0x0000555555573495 in run_test_case () >> #3 0x0000555555573934 in test_run () >> #4 0x000055555555c7cd in main () at src/log/apitest/logtest.c:569 >> (gdb) >> >> ============================================================== >> ======================================== >> >> -AVM >> >> On 2/22/2017 9:48 AM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote: >>> Hi Mahesh, >>> >>> I send them in attachment instead, and name them in the order. >>> I just pull the latest code, and apply them without getting any hunk > error. >>> Please try with them, and let me know if you see any problem. >>> >>> Regards, Vu >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: A V Mahesh [mailto:mahesh.va...@oracle.com] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:09 AM >>>> To: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au>; >>>> lennart.l...@ericsson.com; canh.v.tru...@dektech.com.au >>>> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for log: add alternative >>>> destinations of log records [#2258] V4 >>>> >>>> Hi Vu, >>>> >>>> I did follow that still i get Hunk #2 FAILED even on today's staging >>>> >>>> >> ============================================================== >>>> ================== >>>> >>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# patch -p1 <2293 >>>> patching file src/base/Makefile.am >>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 33 (offset 1 line). >>>> Hunk #3 succeeded at 183 (offset 1 line). >>>> patching file src/base/file_descriptor.cc >>>> patching file src/base/file_descriptor.h >>>> patching file src/base/tests/unix_socket_test.cc >>>> patching file src/base/unix_client_socket.cc >>>> patching file src/base/unix_server_socket.cc >>>> patching file src/base/unix_socket.cc >>>> patching file src/base/unix_socket.h >>>> >>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# patch -p1 <2258-1 >>>> patching file src/log/Makefile.am >>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 71 (offset -1 lines). >>>> patching file src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml >>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 147. >>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>>> src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml.rej >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc >>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 35 (offset -5 lines). >>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 705. >>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 971. >>>> 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc.rej >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_config.h >>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 304. >>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.h.rej >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_dest.cc >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_dest.h >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_evt.cc >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_imm.cc >>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 45. >>>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 235 (offset -1 lines). >>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 877. >>>> Hunk #4 succeeded at 1273 (offset -20 lines). >>>> Hunk #5 succeeded at 1404 (offset -1 lines). >>>> Hunk #6 succeeded at 1449 (offset -20 lines). >>>> Hunk #7 succeeded at 2032 (offset -1 lines). >>>> Hunk #8 FAILED at 2181. >>>> Hunk #9 succeeded at 2271 (offset -54 lines). >>>> Hunk #10 succeeded at 2387 (offset -1 lines). >>>> Hunk #11 succeeded at 2377 (offset -54 lines). >>>> Hunk #12 succeeded at 2478 (offset -1 lines). >>>> Hunk #13 succeeded at 2684 (offset -54 lines). >>>> Hunk #14 succeeded at 2821 (offset -1 lines). >>>> 3 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>>> src/log/logd/lgs_imm.cc.rej >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_main.cc >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.h >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v5.cc >>>> Hunk #3 succeeded at 133 (offset -1 lines). >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.cc >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.h >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_stream.cc >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_stream.h >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_util.cc >>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_util.h >>>> >>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# patch -p1 <2258-2 >>>> patching file src/log/Makefile.am >>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 180 (offset -3 lines). >>>> patching file src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c >>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1923. >>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 1979. >>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 2067. >>>> Hunk #4 FAILED at 2094. >>>> 4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>>> src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c.rej >>>> patching file src/log/apitest/tet_cfg_destination.c >>>> >>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# patch -p1 <2258-3 >>>> patching file src/log/Makefile >>>> patching file src/log/Makefile.am >>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 80 (offset -1 lines). >>>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 217 (offset -2 lines). >>>> patching file src/log/tests/Makefile >>>> patching file src/log/tests/lgs_dest_test.cc >>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# vi >>>> src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c.rej >>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# >>>> >>>> >> ============================================================== >>>> ======================== >>>> >>>> -AVM >>>> >>>> On 2/21/2017 3:53 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote: >>>>> Hi Mahesh, >>>>> >>>>> As I has mentioned in below: >>>>>>> To run the test, this patch has dependent on following patches: >>>>>>> 1) #2293 (sent by Anders Widel, but not yet pushed) >>>>>>> 2) #2258 (v2, sent by Lennart, but not yet pushed yet) >>>>> So, you need to apply #2293 first, then #2258 which sent by Lennart >>>>> yesterday, then mine. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, Vu >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: A V Mahesh [mailto:mahesh.va...@oracle.com] >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 5:10 PM >>>>>> To: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au>; >>>>>> lennart.l...@ericsson.com; canh.v.tru...@dektech.com.au >>>>>> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for log: add alternative >>>>>> destinations of log records [#2258] V4 >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Vu, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this applies on top of log #2146 - V4 , I see both #tickets >>> has >>>>>> version changes ? >>>>>> >>>>>> in which order i need to apply ( #2146 & #2258 ) or (#2258 & >>> #2146). >>>>>> ========================================================= >>>>>> >>>>>> patching file src/log/Makefile.am >>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 72. >>>>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 120. >>>>>> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>> src/log/Makefile.am.rej >>>>>> patching file src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml >>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 147. >>>>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>>>>> src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml.rej >>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc >>>>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 35 (offset -5 lines). >>>>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 705. >>>>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 971. >>>>>> 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc.rej >>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_config.h >>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 304. >>>>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.h.rej >>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_dest.cc >>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_dest.h >>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_evt.cc >>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. >>>>>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 30 with fuzz 2 (offset 2 lines). >>>>>> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1282 (offset 45 lines). >>>>>> Hunk #4 succeeded at 1300 (offset 2 lines). >>>>>> 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_evt.cc.rej >>>>>> >>>>>> >> ============================================================== >>>>>> === >>>>>> >>>>>> -AVM >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/21/2017 3:03 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote: >>>>>>> Summary: log: add alternative destinations of log records [#2258] >>>>>>> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2258 >>>>>>> Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart, Canh, Mahesh >>>>>>> Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>> >>>>>>> Affected branch(es): Default >>>>>>> Development branch: Default >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------------------------- >>>>>>> Impacted area Impact y/n >>>>>>> -------------------------------- >>>>>>> Docs n >>>>>>> Build system n >>>>>>> RPM/packaging n >>>>>>> Configuration files n >>>>>>> Startup scripts n >>>>>>> SAF services n >>>>>>> OpenSAF services y >>>>>>> Core libraries n >>>>>>> Samples n >>>>>>> Tests y >>>>>>> Other n >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To run the test, this patch has dependent on following patches: >>>>>>> 1) #2293 (sent by Anders Widel, but not yet pushed) >>>>>>> 2) #2258 (v2, sent by Lennart, but not yet pushed yet) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> changeset d74aaf3025c99cade3165a15831124548f4d85bd >>>>>>> Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au> >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:36:00 +0700 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> log: add alternative destinations of log records [#2258] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here are major info, detailed info will be added to PR doc > soon. 1) >>>>>> Add >>>>>>> attribute "saLogRecordDestination" to log stream. 2) Add > Local >>>>>> socket >>>>>>> destintion handler 3) Integrate into first increment made by > Lennart >>>>>>> changeset 4bae27a478c235df3058f43c92d3a5483233b01d >>>>>>> Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au> >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:07:09 +0700 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> log: add UML test case to verify alternative destination > [#2258] >>>>>>> Major changes: 1) Modify Lennart's test cases because > enhancing >>>>>> destination >>>>>>> configuration validation rules. 2) Add test suite #17 to > verify >>>>>> alternative >>>>>>> destination >>>>>>> >>>>>>> changeset bc375725fed22bb4f8cb3ae3df5f96fb9d281efb >>>>>>> Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au> >>>>>>> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:22:13 +0700 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> log: add unit tests to verify interfaces provided by > destination >>>>>> handler >>>>>>> [#2258] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Unit tests to verify major interfaces: 1) CfgDestination() > 2) >>>>>>> WriteToDestination() >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Added Files: >>>>>>> ------------ >>>>>>> src/log/apitest/tet_cfg_destination.c >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_dest.cc >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_dest.h >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.cc >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.h >>>>>>> src/log/tests/lgs_dest_test.cc >>>>>>> src/log/tests/Makefile >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Complete diffstat: >>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>> src/log/Makefile | 4 + >>>>>>> src/log/Makefile.am | 31 +++++- >>>>>>> src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c | 8 +- >>>>>>> src/log/apitest/tet_cfg_destination.c | 483 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml | 7 +- >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc | 169 >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.h | 3 +- >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_dest.cc | 707 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_dest.h | 576 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_evt.cc | 33 ++++++ >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_imm.cc | 202 >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_main.cc | 8 + >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc | 103 ++++++++++++++++++- >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.h | 6 +- >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v5.cc | 10 + >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.cc | 177 >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.h | 67 +++++++++++++ >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_stream.cc | 60 +++++++++++- >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_stream.h | 16 +++ >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_util.cc | 63 ++++++++++++ >>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_util.h | 11 +- >>>>>>> src/log/tests/Makefile | 20 +++ >>>>>>> src/log/tests/lgs_dest_test.cc | 209 >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> 23 files changed, 2896 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Testing Commands: >>>>>>> ----------------- >>>>>>> Run UML test suite #17 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Testing, Expected Results: >>>>>>> -------------------------- >>>>>>> All test passed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Conditions of Submission: >>>>>>> ------------------------- >>>>>>> <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Arch Built Started Linux distro >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> mips n n >>>>>>> mips64 n n >>>>>>> x86 n n >>>>>>> x86_64 n n >>>>>>> powerpc n n >>>>>>> powerpc64 n n >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reviewer Checklist: >>>>>>> ------------------- >>>>>>> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any >>>> checkmarks!] >>>>>>> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank >>>>> entries >>>>>>> that need proper data filled in. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and >>> push. >>>>>>> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your >>>>>> headers/comments/text. >>>>>>> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your >>> commits. >>>>>>> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your > comments/files >>>>>>> (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build >>> tests. >>>>>>> Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be >>>> removed. >>>>>>> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace >>>> crimes >>>>>>> like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other >>>>>>> cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate >>> commits. >>>>>>> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there > is >>>>>>> too much content into a single commit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; >>>>>>> Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be >>>>> pulled. >>>>>>> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as >>>> threaded >>>>>>> commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear >>>>> indication >>>>>>> of what has changed between each re-send. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of > the >>>>>>> comments and change requests that were proposed in the > initial >>>>> review. >>>>>>> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing >> the >>>>>>> the threaded patch review. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any >>>> results >>>>>>> for in-service upgradability test. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch >>>> series >>>>>>> do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
