Summary: AMF: Execute pending jobs in AMFD in shutdown phase [#2376] V2
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 2376
Peer Reviewer(s): AMF maintainers
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): all
Development branch: default

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
 Changes in V2:
 - Patch 02: Only local amfnd in active controller sends node_down message
 - Patch 02: Fix double take handle causes amfnd hang (found in backward 
compatible test)

changeset 4cdf27aceb4f38d55badb22162a1553c22cd097d
Author: Minh Hon Chau <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:28:26 +1100

        AMF: Replace unused message SHUTDOWN_APP_SU_MSG for NODE_DOWN_MSG 
[#2376]

        When opensafd orders amfnd to shutdown node, amfnd firstly removes all
        assignments, secondly terminates all components. The step of assignment
        removal which includes applications' assignment that produces many IMM
        updates towards amfd, amfd could have many pending IMM update jobs at 
this
        stage. Therefore, amfd should by somehow try to execute all pending jobs
        after the first stage and before the second stage in which amfnd 
terminates
        IMM components. Based on this analysis, a new message called 
NODE_DOWN_MSG
        is introduced as following

         AMFND AMFD | | "Remove all assignments" | | |--NODE_DOWN_MSG-->|
        |<------ACK--------| | | "Terminates all components" | |

        This patch is the first patch of series that introduces NODE_DOWN_MSG, 
which
        is a replacement of unused message SHUTDOWN_APP_SU_MSG.

changeset 042a6b3614d2f53fdc76b6ac30f46f29436c8646
Author: Minh Hon Chau <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:28:26 +1100

        AMF: Handle node_down message [#2376] V2

        This patch is how amfnd and amfd handles node_down message. Before amfnd
        enters component termination, amfnd sends node_down message to amfd, a 
timer
        is started. In amfd, upon reception of node_down message, amfd will try 
to
        execute all of its pending jobs. A node ack is sent if amfd finish all 
its
        jobs. If the timer is expired or amfnd receives node ack message for
        NODE_DOWN_MSG, amfnd will continue its component termination phase

changeset 8aea7acfb7e5d7e1ba24948ecbf9d6474fba68e5
Author: Minh Hon Chau <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:28:26 +1100

        AMFD: Job queue differentiation [#2376]

        amfd needs to prioritize to execute IMM updates jobs in its queue. This
        patch makes a differentiation of job type in amfd's queue so that amfd 
can
        know to execute IMM jobs first


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/amf/amfd/evt.h          |   2 +-
 src/amf/amfd/imm.cc         |  59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 src/amf/amfd/imm.h          |  36 +++++++++++++++++------
 src/amf/amfd/main.cc        |   6 ++--
 src/amf/amfd/ndfsm.cc       |  59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 src/amf/amfd/proc.h         |   1 +
 src/amf/amfnd/avnd_defs.h   |   2 +
 src/amf/amfnd/avnd_di.h     |   1 +
 src/amf/amfnd/avnd_mds.h    |   1 +
 src/amf/amfnd/di.cc         |  66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 src/amf/amfnd/main.cc       |   2 +-
 src/amf/amfnd/mds.cc        |   2 +-
 src/amf/amfnd/susm.cc       |  12 ++++++-
 src/amf/amfnd/term.cc       |   9 ++++-
 src/amf/common/amf_d2nmsg.h |  11 +++++--
 src/amf/common/d2nedu.c     |  12 ++++----
 16 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
 - As V1


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
 - As V1


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 ack from reviewer(s)


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to