Summary: amfd: make auto repair restriction configurable [#2435]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2435
Peer Reviewer(s): AMF devs
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2435
Base revision: 66970f59421f9d4338ee6d13134afca9082c1e91
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/userid-2226215/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y 
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
*** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE ***

revision be7b51d723db24721c19b0b4953e794215f86d88
Author: Gary Lee <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:36:51 +1000

amfd: make auto repair restriction configurable [#2435]

This adds a configuration object for AMF at amfConfig=1,safApp=safAmfService.

A configuration attribute 'amfRestrictAutoRepairEnable' is added.
This determines if 'suMaintenanceCampaign' should be ignored to maintain
legacy AMF behaviour. The default behaviour is not to support auto repair
restriction.

To enable restriction:
immcfg -a amfRestrictAutoRepairEnable=1 amfConfig=1,safApp=safAmfService

To disable restriction:
immcfg -a amfRestrictAutoRepairEnable=0 amfConfig=1,safApp=safAmfService



Added Files:
------------
 src/amf/amfd/config.cc
 src/amf/amfd/config.h


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/amf/Makefile.am            |   3 +
 src/amf/amfd/comp.cc           |   2 +-
 src/amf/amfd/config.cc         | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 src/amf/amfd/config.h          |  21 +++++
 src/amf/amfd/imm.cc            |  35 ++++++--
 src/amf/amfd/ndproc.cc         |   4 +-
 src/amf/amfd/node.cc           |   4 +-
 src/amf/amfd/sgproc.cc         |  14 ++--
 src/amf/amfd/su.cc             |  37 +++++++--
 src/amf/amfd/su.h              |   3 +-
 src/amf/common/amf_defs.h      |   3 +
 src/amf/config/amf_classes.xml |  15 ++++
 src/amf/config/amf_objects.xml |   7 ++
 13 files changed, 300 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Test 1)
Turn on tracing for AMFND

Ensure ‘restrict auto repair’ is disabled:
immcfg -a 
amfRestrictAutoRepairEnable=0 amfConfig=1,safApp=safAmfService

Set campaign on an SU:
immcfg -a saAmfSUMaintenanceCampaign="foo" 
safSu=PL-5,safSg=NoRed,safApp=OpenSAF

Enable ‘restrict auto repair':
immcfg -a amfRestrictAutoRepairEnable=1 
amfConfig=1,safApp=safAmfService

Ensure the change is propagated to AMFND on PL-5 by looking for this in the 
trace:
  TRACE("suMaintenanceCampaign for '%s' changed to '%s'",
  su->name.c_str(), 
su->suMaintenanceCampaign.c_str());

Test 2)
        1.      Enable 'restrict auto repair'
        2.      "amf-adm restart <comp>" should work when suMaintenence is set 
for enclosing SU
        3.      kill <comp> when suMaintenance is set, auto repair will not 
occur


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
*** PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS ***


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
*** HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC ***


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y 
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to