Summary: log: refactor log agent - 2nd increment [#2412]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2412
Peer Reviewer(s): LOG Devs
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2412
Base revision: 8c09ce778f01cd0b202a2b7b9fd51dbc14648674
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/winhvu/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
*** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE ***

revision ab6cf7db983cc97ad4e4b5e39327bd9c72004d11
Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2017 12:39:12 +0200

log: refactor log agent - 2nd increment [#2412]

The major changes are:
1) Replacing C database of client list and stream list to C++.
2) Centralizing databases read/write to one place
3) Remove global log agent control block



Added Files:
------------
 src/log/agent/lga_agent.cc
 src/log/agent/lga_agent.h
 src/log/agent/lga_client.cc
 src/log/agent/lga_client.h
 src/log/agent/lga_common.h
 src/log/agent/lga_stream.cc
 src/log/agent/lga_stream.h
 src/log/apitest/tet_multiple_thread.c


Removed Files:
--------------
 src/log/agent/lga_api.h
 src/log/agent/lga.h


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/log/Makefile.am                   |   16 +-
 src/log/agent/lga.h                   |  137 ----
 src/log/agent/lga_agent.cc            | 1445 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 src/log/agent/lga_agent.h             |  408 ++++++++++
 src/log/agent/lga_api.cc              | 1435 +-------------------------------
 src/log/agent/lga_api.h               |   70 --
 src/log/agent/lga_client.cc           |  439 ++++++++++
 src/log/agent/lga_client.h            |  305 +++++++
 src/log/agent/lga_common.h            |   68 ++
 src/log/agent/lga_mds.cc              |  428 +++++-----
 src/log/agent/lga_mds.h               |    7 +-
 src/log/agent/lga_state.cc            |  509 ++----------
 src/log/agent/lga_state.h             |   25 +-
 src/log/agent/lga_stream.cc           |  147 ++++
 src/log/agent/lga_stream.h            |  175 ++++
 src/log/agent/lga_util.cc             |  770 +-----------------
 src/log/agent/lga_util.h              |   31 +-
 src/log/apitest/tet_multiple_thread.c |  317 ++++++++
 18 files changed, 3624 insertions(+), 3108 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Run `logtest`. One new test suite is introduced
to verify if having any deadlock or coredump.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
All tests PASS


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
*** HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC ***


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to