Summary: plm: fix systemd files for plm and opensaf [#2581]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2581
Peer Reviewer(s): Mathi, Anders
Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2581
Base revision: e10be3fba18937d31a638972af5001c5b0978fe8
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/trguitar/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         y
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n

NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

revision cdc395605d32e40c1ec53d43827506427cd63735
Author: Alex Jones <alex.jo...@genband.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:58:50 -0400

plm: fix systemd files for plm and opensaf [#2581]

plmc does not send TERMINATED message to active controller during reboot.

This is because network-online.target is not pulled in explicitly by the PLM
systemd service files, so networking may already be down when the TERMINATED
is sent.

Update systemd service files to pull in network-online.target explicitly.



Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/nid/opensafd.service.in       | 3 ++-
 src/plm/plmcd/plmcboot.service.in | 3 ++-
 src/plm/plmcd/plmcd.service.in    | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
PLM and OpenSAF should start and stop without problems.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
plmc should send TERMINATED message to active controller during reboot.


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
*** HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC ***


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to