Summary: imm: improve the cascade delete [#2667]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2667
Peer Reviewer(s): Vu
Pull request to: Zoran
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2667
Base revision: 36be8313c70f110d1245fc76980b53c7ea45770a
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/zmilinkovic/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n

NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

revision ce29d3b5a78f4d250ff39d9fc8b60c53191c35c3
Author: Zoran Milinkovic <[email protected]>
Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:35:50 +0100

imm: improve the cascade delete [#2667]

IMMND will reduce the number of object deleted messages to PBE with sending 
only one message containing the root object name instead of sending one message 
for each delete object.



Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/imm/common/immpbe_dump.cc | 541 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 src/imm/immnd/ImmModel.cc     |  18 +-
 src/imm/immnd/ImmModel.h      |   3 +-
 src/imm/immnd/immnd_evt.c     | 217 ++++++++---------
 4 files changed, 557 insertions(+), 222 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Test a massive cascade delete with more than 10000 objects.
The best test would be with over 100000 and 200000 objects.


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from Vu


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to