Summary: nid: Set TasksMax systemd option to infinity for opensafd service 
[#2788]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2788
Peer Reviewer(s): Hans, Alex
Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2788
Base revision: 5629f554686a498f328e0c79fc946379cbcf6967
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/anders-w/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     y
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        y
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

revision 6d50f95338496e3d7b17749e9ae9853e044aa33b
Author: Anders Widell <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:19:38 +0100

nid: Set TasksMax systemd option to infinity for opensafd service [#2788]

When using systemd version 227 or later, set the option TasksMax for OpenSAF to
inifinity. This option specifies the maximum number of processes and threads
within the control group for the OpenSAF service. The reason why OpenSAF needs a
large number of processes and threads is that all application processes started
by AMF are running within the same control group, unless they explicitly move
out of it.



Complete diffstat:
------------------
 configure.ac                | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 src/nid/opensafd.service.in |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------

Build OpenSAF with systemd enabled, using systemd version 227 or later.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------

When starting OpenSAF, the file
/sys/fs/cgroup/pids/system.slice/opensafd.service/pids.max should have the
contents "max".


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------

Ack from reviewer(s).


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to