Summary: smfd: Fix incorrect handling of SMFND NCSMDS_UP/DOWN events [#2821]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2821
Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart Lund, Vijay Roy
Pull request to: Lennart Lund
Affected branch(es): develop, release
Development branch: ticket-2821
Base revision: 2e1b1228d0bb8f7aa66773f11ff915d5a39b0748
Personal repository: git://

Impacted area       Impact y/n
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n

NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
revision 218f71b784413703352d618fc9e657a087947635
Author: Nguyen Luu <>
Date:   Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:51:47 +0700

smfd: Fix incorrect handling of SMFND NCSMDS_UP/DOWN events [#2821]

Current handling of SMFND DOWN event does not take into account failed
SMFND UP event, which could eventually result in an inexact view of the
actual number of SMFND nodes in the cluster if, for example, a node
happened to be DOWN and UP twice, and the first UP event somehow failed.

Complete diffstat:
 src/smf/smfd/smfd_evt.c   | 7 ++++---
 src/smf/smfd/smfd_smfnd.c | 9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Testing Commands:
Testing can be done with issue reproduction steps described in the ticket.

Testing, Expected Results:
Expected testing result as mentioned in the ticket.

Conditions of Submission:
Ack from SMF maintainer.

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n

Reviewer Checklist:
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]

Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e., etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites,!
Opensaf-devel mailing list

Reply via email to