Summary: base: Add support to direct OpenSAF logging to local node file [#2306] Review request for Ticket(s): 2306 Peer Reviewer(s): Anders, Hans, Ravi Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE *** Affected branch(es): develop Development branch: ticket-2306 Base revision: aff54ff091727f27830443332b830890668749cf Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/minh-chau/review
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- *** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE *** revision f7f80c0372017bb3b5b94c927e08a86adf61e286 Author: Minh Chau <minh.c...@dektech.com.au> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:02:46 +1000 base: Example of OSAF_LOCAL_LOG_FILE environment variable in amfd.conf file [#2306] This commit is only an example to show where OSAF_LOCAL_LOG_FILE is configured. This commit will not be pushed. The introduction of OSAF_LOCAL_LOG_FILE for all services will be in another commit. revision 9ad63ddd3259950ab270aa9797742fbb801a6594 Author: Minh Chau <minh.c...@dektech.com.au> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:36:05 +1000 base: Add support to direct OpenSAF logging to local node file [#2306] Unify TraceLog and MdsLog class to one class (TraceLog) so it can be used as a common log client. Add new instance TraceLog for OpenSAF logging to local file, which can be enabled/disabled via environment variable OSAF_LOCAL_NODE_LOG Complete diffstat: ------------------ src/amf/amfd/amfd.conf | 6 ++ src/base/logtrace.cc | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ src/base/logtrace.h | 50 +++++++++++++-- src/mds/mds_log.cc | 114 +++------------------------------ 4 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 191 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- *** LIST THE COMMAND LINE TOOLS/STEPS TO TEST YOUR CHANGES *** Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- *** PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS *** Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- ack from reviewers Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel