Summary: base: Add support to direct OpenSAF logging to local node file V2 [#2306] Review request for Ticket(s): 2306 Peer Reviewer(s): Anders, Hans, Ravi Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE *** Affected branch(es): develop Development branch: ticket-2306 Base revision: e2085243f066d4f48de921a217f6b593da71419f Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/minh-chau/review
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services n OpenSAF services n Core libraries y Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- *** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE *** revision 79f749d8016f0e5b6f3d010615f0899d2a713c7b Author: Minh Chau <minh.c...@dektech.com.au> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:05:54 +1000 base: Add OSAF_LOCAL_NODE_LOG environment variable to osaf service conf file [#2306] revision dbcae201ead835ec8cf7e9791dcb1bd6b62152fd Author: Minh Chau <minh.c...@dektech.com.au> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 14:40:31 +1000 base: Add support to direct OpenSAF logging to local node file V2 [#2306] Unify TraceLog and MdsLog class to one class (TraceLog) so it can be used as a common log client. Add new instance TraceLog for OpenSAF logging to local file, which can be enabled/disabled via environment variable OSAF_LOCAL_NODE_LOG. Complete diffstat: ------------------ src/amf/amfd/amfd.conf | 5 ++ src/amf/amfnd/amfnd.conf | 5 ++ src/amf/amfwd/amfwdog.conf | 5 ++ src/base/logtrace.cc | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- src/base/logtrace.h | 48 +++++++++++- src/ckpt/ckptd/ckptd.conf | 5 ++ src/ckpt/ckptnd/ckptnd.conf | 5 ++ src/clm/clmd/clmd.conf | 5 ++ src/clm/clmnd/clmna.conf | 5 ++ src/dtm/dtmnd/dtmd.conf | 5 ++ src/evt/evtd/evtd.conf | 5 ++ src/fm/fmd/fmd.conf | 5 ++ src/imm/immd/immd.conf | 4 + src/imm/immnd/immnd.conf | 5 ++ src/lck/lckd/lckd.conf | 5 ++ src/lck/lcknd/lcknd.conf | 5 ++ src/log/logd/logd.conf | 5 ++ src/mbc/mbcsv_papi.h | 13 ++-- src/mds/mds_log.cc | 124 +++---------------------------- src/msg/msgd/msgd.conf | 5 ++ src/msg/msgnd/msgnd.conf | 5 ++ src/ntf/ntfd/ntfd.conf | 5 ++ src/plm/plmd/plmd.conf | 5 ++ src/rde/rded/rde.conf | 5 ++ src/smf/smfd/smfd.conf | 5 ++ src/smf/smfnd/smfnd.conf | 5 ++ 26 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 210 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- *** LIST THE COMMAND LINE TOOLS/STEPS TO TEST YOUR CHANGES *** Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- *** PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS *** Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- ack from reviewers Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel