Summary: smf: Add capability to redo CCBs that fail [#1398]
Review request for Ticket(s): 1398
Peer Reviewer(s): hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-1398
Base revision: 1ca82324e733acd3a2fc9272253a65df7ed31baa
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/elunlen/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n

NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
*** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE ***
INFORMATION:
This is the second and final increment for this ticket.
Increment 1 implements the IMM CCB handler and refactor handling of
parallel locking and exec control handler to use the IMM CCB handler

This increment is a refactoring of the "main" ccb handling that is used during
a campaign. Note that this handling is using IMM as a database to store campaign
states and data. No OI is used so the SA_IMM_CCB_REGISTERED_OI flag is not set.
For more information see src/smf/smfd/imm_modify_config/immccb.h

revision c033a5cc90dd22e302b385d2eb7925190114d2c1
Author: Lennart Lund <lennart.l...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 May 2018 15:55:51 +0200

smf: Add capability to redo CCBs that fail [#1398]

Refactoring "main" CCB handling. Is mainly affecting SmfImmOperation and
doImmOperations in SmfUtils.
Some changes done with ticket #2584 are reverted



Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/smf/smfd/SmfAdminState.cc                      |  23 +-
 src/smf/smfd/SmfAdminState.h                       |  20 +-
 src/smf/smfd/SmfCampState.cc                       |  10 +-
 src/smf/smfd/SmfCampaignInit.cc                    |   4 -
 src/smf/smfd/SmfCampaignWrapup.cc                  |  22 +-
 src/smf/smfd/SmfCampaignXmlParser.cc               | 713 ++++++++-------
 src/smf/smfd/SmfImmApplierHdl.cc                   |   2 +-
 src/smf/smfd/SmfImmOperation.cc                    | 985 ++-------------------
 src/smf/smfd/SmfImmOperation.h                     | 590 +++++-------
 src/smf/smfd/SmfRollback.cc                        |  50 +-
 src/smf/smfd/SmfRollback.h                         |  11 +
 src/smf/smfd/SmfStepState.h                        |   2 +
 src/smf/smfd/SmfUpgradeAction.cc                   |  11 +-
 src/smf/smfd/SmfUpgradeCampaign.cc                 |  86 +-
 src/smf/smfd/SmfUpgradeProcedure.cc                | 134 +--
 src/smf/smfd/SmfUpgradeStep.cc                     |  66 +-
 src/smf/smfd/SmfUpgradeStep.h                      |  16 +-
 src/smf/smfd/SmfUtils.cc                           | 184 ++--
 src/smf/smfd/SmfUtils.h                            |  23 +-
 .../smfd/imm_modify_config/add_operation_to_ccb.cc |  16 +-
 src/smf/smfd/imm_modify_config/immccb.cc           |  23 +-
 src/smf/smfd/imm_modify_config/immccb.h            |  84 +-
 src/smf/smfd/imm_modify_demo/ccbdemo_create.cc     |  12 +-
 src/smf/smfd/imm_modify_demo/ccbhdl_test.cc        |  52 +-
 src/smf/smfd/imm_om_ccapi/common/common.h          |   7 -
 src/smf/smfd/imm_om_ccapi/om_handle.cc             |  17 -
 src/smf/smfd/smfd_smfnd.h                          |   3 +-
 27 files changed, 1167 insertions(+), 1999 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Run some campaigns. SMF demo could be used.
Also the CCB handler can be tested independently of SMF
A test program can be found in imm_modify/demo/ccbhdl_test
Note: To run the ccbhdl_test.
./configure --enable-tests --enable-immxml
In UML:
$ ccbhdl_test

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
SMF shall work as before


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
*** HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC ***


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to