Summary: plmd: fix adding and removing of invocation id to list [#197]
Review request for Ticket(s): 197
Peer Reviewer(s): Mathi, Ravi
Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-197
Base revision: 9310db55886092748469c6d3e09f6b3bb021886f
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/trguitar/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

revision c0e8a1d9b6e1a8e53f8f0ffbff9b86c40ee0d6b6
Author: Alex Jones <ajo...@rbbn.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Sep 2018 15:31:17 -0400

plmd: fix adding and removing of invocation id to list [#197]

Jan 22 11:09:03 localhost osafplmd[3988]: Invocation id mentioned in the resp, 
is not found in the grp->inocation_list. inv_id: 9

If multiple entities are part of the same entity group, and START or VALIDATE
tracking is requested, if an admin operation is done on these entities, once
one response is sent the other responses are ignored. But, the entities that
didn't return a successful response all report "Admin operation can not be
performed" because they failed to process the tracking response. This is
because when the first invocation id is removed from the list, all the others
are removed, too. Now those entities are stuck in this bad state.

Fix the remove routines so that only the invocation in the response is
removed from the list.



Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/plm/plmd/plms_utils.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
See ticket.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
All entities shutdown when tracking response is sent, and no errors show up
in messages log.

Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Sep 20, or ack from developer.


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.



_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to