Hi Hans/Vu/Gary/Alex, Polite remainder for review. Thanks Mohan High Availability Solutions Pvt. Ltd. www.hasolutions.in
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Review Request for ckpt: add new test cases in apitest [#2939] From: "Mohan Kanakam" <mo...@hasolutions.in> Date: 10/12/18 3:28 pm To: hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com, vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au, gary....@dektech.com.au, ajo...@rbbn.com Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Mohan Kanakam" <mo...@hasolutions.in> Summary: ckpt: add new test case of API saCkptCheckpointOpen() of apitest [#2939] Review request for Ticket(s): 2939_2 Peer Reviewer(s):Hans Nordeback, Vu Minh Nguyen, Gary Lee, Alex Jones Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE *** Affected branch(es): develop Development branch: ticket-2939_2 Base revision: cad806745a2eb96024ff18081ccf6d208b0fb93b Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/mohan-hasoln/review -------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services n OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests y Other n NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- *** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE *** revision 0e7f00e947bd26a5a2ea783dead46bcdffea57e6 Author: Mohan Kanakam <mo...@hasolutions.in> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 15:10:59 +0530 ckpt: add new test case of API saCkptCheckpointStatusGet() of apitest [#2939] revision 9746a8ed4f34d801c6bf359f85366e2d46ba69b1 Author: Mohan Kanakam <mo...@hasolutions.in> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:19:25 +0530 ckpt: add new test case of API saCkptCheckpointUnlink() of apitest [#2939] revision 7380183362522558168ba091ffc4a63ef8631107 Author: Mohan Kanakam <mo...@hasolutions.in> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:08:03 +0530 ckpt: add new test case of API saCkptCheckpointClose() of apitest [#2939] revision 034a14a9188ef72637dfa33327242ce473af6786 Author: Mohan Kanakam <mo...@hasolutions.in> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:22:07 +0530 ckpt: add new test case of API saCkptCheckpointOpen() of apitest [#2939] Complete diffstat: ------------------ src/ckpt/apitest/test_cpa.c | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- src/ckpt/apitest/test_cpa_util.c | 22 +++++- src/ckpt/apitest/test_cpsv.h | 5 ++ src/ckpt/apitest/test_cpsv_conf.h | 2 + 4 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- ./ckpttest Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- 58 PASSED To verify opening a ckpt with synchronous update option with syc cbk handle 59 PASSED To verify opening a ckpt with asynchronous update option with syc cbk handle 9 PASSED To verify that close after finalize 13 PASSED To test unlink with synchronous update handle 14 PASSED To test unlink with asynchronous update handle 5 PASSED To test Status get for active replica ckpt Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- Ack from maintainers. Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
