Summary: osaf: supports compile/build with gcc/g++ 12 [#3346] Review request for Ticket(s): 3346 Peer Reviewer(s): Thien, Dat Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE *** Affected branch(es): develop Development branch: ticket-3346 Base revision: f8fd609eb95fa347b0f1f94cb73bbd94fac61229 Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/thangng/review
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- revision e01bbd5f649452acf4df8046fc8fcacd30bac792 Author: thang.d.nguyen <thang.d.ngu...@dektech.com.au> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 17:23:45 +0700 osaf: supports compile/build with gcc/g++ 12 [#3346] Fix error when compiling/building Opensaf using gcc/g++ 12. Complete diffstat: ------------------ src/amf/amfd/node.h | 5 ++++- src/dtm/dtmnd/dtm_node_db.cc | 2 +- src/imm/immnd/immnd_proc.c | 2 +- src/osaf/consensus/key_value.cc | 1 + src/smf/smfd/SmfProcedureThread.cc | 43 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- N/A Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- N/A Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- Ack from reviewer Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel