But I should also add that a test using a continuous stream of ccbs is a good 
stress test of the imm.
The point is only that we dont need to optimize the implementation a lot to 
cater for that use case.

/AndersBj

________________________________
From: Anders Bjornerstedt [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: den 2 oktober 2014 16:37
To: [email protected]
Subject: [tickets] [opensaf:tickets] Re: #952 immsv: sync data Mbcsv Check 
pointing can be optimized


Yes that makes sense.
But continuos small ccbs of this kind is not really a realistic test of immsv.

Real CCB usage is typically a burst of small changes or in some cases one large 
CCB.
Very rarely is there a continuous stream of new CCBs generated over a long time.
in fact you could argue that it is incorrect use of the IMM since such streming 
updates of data
indicate that it is not really config data.

We do of course then have the case of persistent runtime data.
But PRT is a strange concept that no one knows what it is good for and no onw 
should relally use :-)

It is quite important to limit the scope of the indented function for the imm.
It is not a high write transaction throughput database.
For reads though faste is always better and worth working more on.

/AndersBj

________________________________

From: A V Mahesh (AVM) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: den 2 oktober 2014 16:25
To: [opensaf:tickets]
Subject: [opensaf:tickets] Re: #952 immsv: sync data Mbcsv Check pointing can 
be optimized

In one of my test case where I was creating contentious objected creation on 
bother Active & Standby then triggered fail-over and observed very large data 
(size:92808 see below ) in FinilizeSync message , if I Stop Object creation on 
both node and give some delay of 5 minits , and then do fail-over IMMD is 
sending very small data size:11682 ( see below )

====================================================================================
Sep 30 9:53:25.977339 osafimmd [868:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 immd_evt_proc_fevs_req 
send_count:68734 size:60596
Sep 30 9:53:26.072524 osafimmd [868:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 immd_evt_proc_fevs_req 
send_count:68735 size:60594 <==========Sync
Sep 30 9:53:26.142643 osafimmd [868:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 immd_evt_proc_fevs_req 
send_count:68736 size:50486
.........................................
Sep 30 9:53:26.204038 osafimmd [868:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 immd_evt_proc_fevs_req 
send_count:68748 size:628
Sep 30 9:53:26.207858 osafimmd [868:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 immd_evt_proc_fevs_req 
send_count:68749 size:16
Sep 30 9:53:26.211459 osafimmd [868:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 immd_evt_proc_fevs_req 
send_count:68750 size:1716
Sep 30 9:53:26.215674 osafimmd [868:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 immd_evt_proc_fevs_req 
send_count:68751 size:11682 <====== with some delay FinilizeSync =============

====================================================================================
Sep 30 10:05:31.284906 osafimmd [21206:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 
immd_evt_proc_fevs_req send_count:78183 size:60560
Sep 30 10:05:31.365129 osafimmd [21206:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 
immd_evt_proc_fevs_req send_count:78184 size:60598 <==========Sync
Sep 30 10:05:31.404772 osafimmd [21206:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 
immd_evt_proc_fevs_req send_count:78185 size:17820
Sep 30 10:05:31.407538 osafimmd [21206:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 
immd_evt_proc_fevs_req send_count:78186 size:16
.....................
Sep 30 10:05:31.473186 osafimmd [21206:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 
immd_evt_proc_fevs_req send_count:78198 size:16
Sep 30 10:05:31.475273 osafimmd [21206:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 
immd_evt_proc_fevs_req send_count:78199 size:1716
Sep 30 10:05:31.480167 osafimmd [21206:immd_evt.c:0273] T5 
immd_evt_proc_fevs_req send_count:78200 size:92808 <=======with out some delay 
FinilizeSync============
====================================================================================

________________________________

[tickets:#952]<http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/952>http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/952
 immsv: sync data Mbcsv Check pointing can be optimized

Status: unassigned
Milestone: future
Created: Tue Jul 08, 2014 03:31 AM UTC by A V Mahesh (AVM)
Last Updated: Thu Oct 02, 2014 01:46 PM UTC
Owner: nobody

On 7/7/2014 9:58 AM, A V Mahesh wrote:
While IMMD broadcasting datasync message (IMMND_EVT_D2ND_GLOB_FEVS_REQ_2)
to IMMNDs additionally the same message (including large sync data) getting 
Check pointed to standby director , this means for eachdata`sync FEVS message
(IMMND_EVT_D2ND_GLOB_FEVS_REQ_2) IMMD is sending two messages one to IMMND's as 
BCAST and one to peer IMMD as R-BCAST (MBCSV).

Currently in my observation if fault happens when sync is in-progress that sync 
gets aborted ,
and the new active is starting a fresh sync. If my understanding is right ,
why we need to Check point IMMND_EVT_D2ND_GLOB_FEVS_REQ_2 message to peer IMMD 
including large sync data?

________________________________

Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in 
https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/952/<https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/952>https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/952

To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit 
https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/<https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions>https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions

________________________________

[tickets:#952]<http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/952> immsv: sync data 
Mbcsv Check pointing can be optimized

Status: unassigned
Milestone: future
Created: Tue Jul 08, 2014 03:31 AM UTC by A V Mahesh (AVM)
Last Updated: Thu Oct 02, 2014 01:46 PM UTC
Owner: nobody

On 7/7/2014 9:58 AM, A V Mahesh wrote:
While IMMD broadcasting datasync message (IMMND_EVT_D2ND_GLOB_FEVS_REQ_2)
to IMMNDs additionally the same message (including large sync data) getting 
Check pointed to standby director , this means for eachdata`sync FEVS message
(IMMND_EVT_D2ND_GLOB_FEVS_REQ_2) IMMD is sending two messages one to IMMND's as 
BCAST and one to peer IMMD as R-BCAST (MBCSV).

Currently in my observation if fault happens when sync is in-progress that sync 
gets aborted ,
and the new active is starting a fresh sync. If my understanding is right ,
why we need to Check point IMMND_EVT_D2ND_GLOB_FEVS_REQ_2 message to peer IMMD 
including large sync data?

________________________________

Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is 
subscribed to 
http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/<http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets>

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/admin/tickets/options. Or, if this is a 
mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.



---

** [tickets:#952] immsv: sync data Mbcsv Check pointing can be optimized**

**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** future
**Created:** Tue Jul 08, 2014 03:31 AM UTC by A V Mahesh (AVM)
**Last Updated:** Thu Oct 02, 2014 01:46 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody

On 7/7/2014 9:58 AM, A V Mahesh wrote:
While IMMD broadcasting datasync message (IMMND_EVT_D2ND_GLOB_FEVS_REQ_2)
to IMMNDs additionally the same message (including large sync data) getting 
Check pointed to standby director , this means for eachdata`sync FEVS message 
(IMMND_EVT_D2ND_GLOB_FEVS_REQ_2) IMMD is sending two messages one to IMMND's as 
BCAST and one to peer IMMD as R-BCAST (MBCSV).

Currently in my observation if fault happens when sync is in-progress that sync 
gets aborted ,
and the new active is starting a fresh sync. If my understanding is right ,
why we need to Check point IMMND_EVT_D2ND_GLOB_FEVS_REQ_2 message to peer IMMD 
including large sync data?



---

Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is 
subscribed to http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/admin/tickets/options.  Or, if this is a 
mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-tickets mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-tickets

Reply via email to