---
** [tickets:#1734] amf: handing of CSI dependencies should be same for standby
as active**
**Status:** accepted
**Milestone:** 4.7.1
**Created:** Wed Apr 06, 2016 06:32 PM UTC by Alex Jones
**Last Updated:** Wed Apr 06, 2016 06:32 PM UTC
**Owner:** Alex Jones
saAmfCSIDependencies should follow the same order for STANDBY as ACTIVE. Even
though this is not explicitly mentioned in AMF B.04.01, we agreed that it
should be the case.
>From "users" mailing list:
Hi Alex/Praveen,
I don't remember being part of a discussion where the STANDBY assignments
should be given the same treatment as 'QUIESCED/QUIESCING' in this scenario. I
guess the implementation just took that route based on the words "or another HA
state" as-in P 186, section 3.8.1.3, lines29- 30 - "the active HA state is
removed from components or another HA state is assigned to components"
In my opinion, I think both ACTIVE and STANDBY assignments should follow the
same ordering of dependencies . I also think this brings no additional
considerations whether it is PI or NPI.
Cheers,
Mathi.
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because opensaf-tickets@lists.sourceforge.net is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/admin/tickets/options. Or, if this is a
mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-tickets mailing list
Opensaf-tickets@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-tickets
