Hi,
IMCN will not be started by NTFS on spare controller. NTFS starts IMCN only 
when it gets role. Suppose one standby controller goes down and there is a 
spare controller present in the system. Now AMF will gives standby role to all 
director coponents including RDE and NTFS. RDE upon receiving this standby role 
will send callback to all its clients. NTFS upon receving standby role will 
start IMCN process.
In IMCN patch v4 is taking intial role by calling rda_get_role() to take 
initial role.
I think the concern is if RDE is bit slow and NTFS starts IMCN and it gets 
started even when RDE has not processed its CSI set callback . For active role 
of IMCN this is not a problem because on active controller RDE's role is Active 
from the beginning, so there is no problem for active IMCN. For standby role on 
spare controller, this can still be handled by avoiding termination of IMCN:   
Default role of RDE is quiesced. So with rda_get_role(), IMCN will get either 
quiesced role standby role. If it is quiesced role then in the while loop a if 
condition can again call  rda_get_role() to fetch the role, before proceeding 
for any Dispatch event. Most probalby IMCN will get the role in the beginning 
when it has not entered the while loop. As of now  AMFD process is getting the 
role this way only on spare controller as it not a MW component.


Thanks,
Praveen


---

** [tickets:#2219] ntfd: circular dependency with osafntfimcnd**

**Status:** assigned
**Milestone:** 5.0.2
**Created:** Thu Dec 08, 2016 05:14 AM UTC by Gary Lee
**Last Updated:** Thu Dec 15, 2016 08:56 AM UTC
**Owner:** Praveen


A circular dependency can be seen when performing a si-swap of 
safSi=SC-2N,safApp=OpenSAF:

1. Active NTFD is trying to sync with Standby using MBC
2. Standby NTFD is the process of terminating its local osafntfimcnd. It is 
stuck in timedwait_imcn_exit() and cannot reply to the Active.
3. osafntfimcnd [on standby] is trying to send a notfication to Active NTFD

So we have (1) depending on (2) depending on (3) depending on (1)

This results in a temporary deadlock that dramatically slows down NTFD's 
ability to process its main dispatch loop. The deadlock only lasts for approx. 
1 second, when mbcsv_mds_send_msg() times out. But since there could be lots of 
MBC messages to send, sometimes osafntfimcnd is killed with SIGABRT generating 
a coredump. The si-swap operation will also timeout.

steps to reproduce
- Run loop of ntftest 32
root@SC-1:~# for i in {1..10}; do ntftest 32; done
- On another terminal, keep swapping 2N Opensaf SI, got coredump after couples 
of swaps
root@SC-1:~# amf-adm si-swap safSi=SC-2N,safApp=OpenSAF
...
root@SC-1:~# amf-adm si-swap safSi=SC-2N,safApp=OpenSAF

~~~
SC-2 (active)

There are a lot of send failures. Each taking approx. 1 second to timeout. 
During these 1 second timeouts, NTFD cannot process the main dispatch loop.
    
    Dec  7 11:01:37.531772 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0185] >> 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: sending to vdest:e
    Dec  7 11:01:37.531781 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0209] TR send type 
MDS_SENDTYPE_REDRSP:
    Dec  7 11:01:38.537307 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0247] << 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: failure
    Dec  7 11:01:38.537758 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0185] >> 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: sending to vdest:e
    Dec  7 11:01:38.537766 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0209] TR send type 
MDS_SENDTYPE_REDRSP:
    Dec  7 11:01:39.543180 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0247] << 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: failure
    Dec  7 11:01:39.543695 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0185] >> 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: sending to vdest:e
    Dec  7 11:01:39.543698 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0209] TR send type 
MDS_SENDTYPE_REDRSP:
    Dec  7 11:01:40.545252 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0247] << 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: failure
    Dec  7 11:01:40.545719 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0185] >> 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: sending to vdest:e
    Dec  7 11:01:40.545726 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0209] TR send type 
MDS_SENDTYPE_REDRSP:
    Dec  7 11:01:41.551328 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0247] << 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: failure
    Dec  7 11:01:41.551971 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0185] >> 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: sending to vdest:e
    Dec  7 11:01:41.551979 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0209] TR send type 
MDS_SENDTYPE_REDRSP:
    Dec  7 11:01:42.557594 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0247] << 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: failure
    Dec  7 11:01:42.558171 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0185] >> 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: sending to vdest:e
    Dec  7 11:01:42.558179 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0209] TR send type 
MDS_SENDTYPE_REDRSP:
    Dec  7 11:01:43.564051 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0247] << 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: failure
    Dec  7 11:01:43.564874 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0185] >> 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: sending to vdest:e
    Dec  7 11:01:43.564883 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0209] TR send type 
MDS_SENDTYPE_REDRSP:
    Dec  7 11:01:44.572407 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0247] << 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: failure
    Dec  7 11:01:44.573262 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0185] >> 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: sending to vdest:e
    Dec  7 11:01:44.573271 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0209] TR send type 
MDS_SENDTYPE_REDRSP:
    Dec  7 11:01:45.575091 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0247] << 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: failure
    Dec  7 11:01:47.083548 osafntfd [452:mbcsv_mds.c:0185] >> 
mbcsv_mds_send_msg: sending to vdest:e
    
~~~


~~~
SC-1 (standby)

NTFD is trying to terminate osafntfimcnd. While it is doing that, it cannot 
reply to NTFD on SC-2. Meanwhile, osafntfimcnd is sending NTF notifications to 
NTFD on SC-1.
    
    Dec  7 11:01:35.453151 osafntfd [464:ntfs_imcnutil.c:0316] TR 
handle_state_ntfimcn: Terminating osafntfimcnd process
    Dec  7 11:01:45.474313 osafntfd [464:ntfs_imcnutil.c:0124] TR   Termination 
timeout
    Dec  7 11:01:45.474375 osafntfd [464:ntfs_imcnutil.c:0130] << 
wait_imcnproc_termination: rc = -1, retry_cnt = 101
    Dec  7 11:01:45.474387 osafntfd [464:ntfs_imcnutil.c:0168] TR   Normal 
termination failed. Escalate to abort
    Dec  7 11:01:45.574703 osafntfd [464:ntfs_imcnutil.c:0172] TR   Imcn 
successfully aborted
    Dec  7 11:01:45.574712 osafntfd [464:ntfs_imcnutil.c:0187] << 
timedwait_imcn_exit    
~~~



---

Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is 
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/admin/tickets/options.  Or, if this is a 
mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-tickets mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-tickets

Reply via email to