Hi, Appreciate if I get some directions or advise on what I might be possibly missing anything here while trying to add the new component of different type.
Issue: Adding a new component type is fails loading nwayactive.xml with the below error mentioned in logs Scenario: I am trying to add an additional new type SA-Aware component to the n-wayactive.xml which provides different service. I realized that using a single component type defined by SaAmfCompType would restrict me to use different InstantiationLevel for this new component and a different instantiation script (for this 2nd type of component, which is used for a different service, hence have a different script with its own dependencies libs and like that..). So I planned to define a new SaAmfCompType and its related objects as listed below in IMM model to control the instation order and use different instation scripts. SaAmfCompBaseType SaAmfCSBaseType SaAmfCompType SaAmfCSType SaAmfSutCompType SaAmfSvcTypeCSTypes SaAmfCtCsType SaAmfComp SaAmfCompCsType SaAmfHealthcheck Logs: The problem is when I am trying to load immcfg -f nwayactive.xml, I get the below error. /var/log/messages: Jul 18 17:07:57 payload1 osafimmnd[44036]: WA Aborting ccb 2 while waiting for replies from implementers on COMPLETED Jul 18 17:07:57 payload1 osafimmnd[44036]: NO Ccb 2 ABORTED (immcfg_payload1_44143) Console output while try to run on payload node: [root@payload1 bin]# immcfg -f nwayactive_MultipleComponents.xml Failed to apply object creations 21 [root@payload1 bin]# 1. Is there any way to get more logs/trace to debug IMM related issues to debug? Specifically I have seen multiple return codes like 12, 21 etc. Are they mapped to any enum in source. I have the source tar ball from source forge site with version 4.3.0. Could you please let me know where they are located. 2. Alternatively, I am also thinking to merge both my scripts together, then relative script path issue for two components with same compType will be fixed, but since they belongs to same compType, how do I mention a different instantiation level, to control the instatiation order? Is this feasible or the above approach of defining a new comp type for the 2nd component is better? I am trying to use n-way active redundancy model. 3. If I model two component to share the same SU, do I need to have a separate app.xml file for each component or a single file is enough for bunch of applications shared with many SUs and then merge with main imm.xml. Is it upto the user how she maintains the app.xml ? Which is better approach? Thanks, Dev ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Opensaf-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users
