Hi Praveen, Thanks for the explanation. Maybe I can re-phrase the question in terms of processes rather than SAF entities. I want to have processes A,B and E run on card1 and C,D on card2 with the same failover/revert behavior I described below. How might I sent up the mapping of processes (each process performs a distinct function) to SG’s, SU’s etc to achieve that?
thanks, — tony On Feb 19, 2014, at 1:58 AM, praveen malviya <[email protected]> wrote: > In 2N model only one SU (say SU1) will be active for all SIs and another > SU(say SU2) will be standby for all SIs. > So even if 5 SUs are present, one SU1 will be active and another SU2 > will standby on behalf of all the SIs in the system. > Other SUs are referred as spare SUs. > > Let us suppose SU1 hosted on card1 is active for SI1, SI2,SI3 .... > and SU2 hosted on card2 is standby for SI1,SI2, SI3.... > If card1 reboots, then standby SU2 will become active on behalf of all > the SI1,SI2,SI3 .... > and others pare SU3 will become new standby. > Now if card1 again comes up SU1 will not be given any role on behalf of > all the SIs because SU2 is active and SU3 is standby for all SI1,Si2,SI3.... > > > Thanks > Praveen > On 18-Feb-14 6:25 PM, Tony Hart wrote: >> 2N (saAmfSgtRedundancyModel=1) >> >> On Feb 18, 2014, at 7:17 AM, praveen malviya <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 17-Feb-14 6:27 PM, Tony Hart wrote: >>>> Suppose I have two (identical) server cards in a system and I have 5 SUs >>>> (A,B,C,D,E) that each have an active and standby instance. By default all >>>> the active instances run on card 1 and all standby on card 2. >>> Please tell which redundancy model is being used? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Praveen >>>> What if two of these (C and D say) are heavy CPU users when in the active >>>> state and I’d like to have their active instances automatically assigned >>>> to the other card from A,B and E. So card1 hosts active instances for A,B >>>> and E and card2 hosts active instances for C and D (the standby instances >>>> are oppositely assigned). >>>> >>>> Next if card2 is removed I’d like all the active instances to revert to >>>> card1 (A,B,C,D,E). >>>> >>>> Then if card2 is re-inserted I’d like the original assignments to be >>>> re-instanted (card1=A,B,E and card2=C,D). >>>> >>>> Similarly for card1 insert/re-insert. >>>> >>>> Is this possible with openSAF? >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> — >>>> tony >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Android apps run on BlackBerry 10 >>>> Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps. >>>> Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more. >>>> Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience. Start now. >>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Opensaf-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Opensaf-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users
