Please see inline with [Praveen]

Thanks,
Praveen

On 20-Apr-16 6:20 PM, Rodriguez Rodrigo, Jose Angel [ABANCE] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not able to start OpenSAF when selecting TIPC as transport method. I have 
> checked that TIPC is working with this command:
>
> #tipc-config -l
> Links:
> broadcast-link: up
> 1.1.81:eth0-1.1.41:eth0: up
>
>
> The log of the starting process is this:
>
> #journalctl --output=short-precise -xu opensafd
> -- Logs begin at Wed 2016-04-20 12:26:13 UTC, end at Wed 2016-04-20 12:32:25 
> UTC. --
> Apr 20 12:30:55.598188 blade0401 systemd[1]: Starting OpenSAF daemon...
> -- Subject: Unit opensafd.service has begun with start-up
> -- Defined-By: systemd
> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> --
> -- Unit opensafd.service has begun starting up.
> Apr 20 12:30:55.699918 blade0401 osafrded[1184]: Started
> Apr 20 12:30:57.704613 blade0401 osafrded[1184]: NO No peer available => 
> Setting Active role for this node
> Apr 20 12:30:57.725935 blade0401 osaffmd[1200]: Started
> Apr 20 12:30:57.751823 blade0401 osafimmd[1217]: Started
> Apr 20 12:30:57.784455 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: Started
> Apr 20 12:30:57.891584 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO SERVER STATE: 
> IMM_SERVER_ANONYMOUS --> IMM_SERVER_CLUSTER_WAITING
> Apr 20 12:30:57.892290 blade0401 osafimmd[1217]: NO New IMMND process is on 
> ACTIVE Controller at 2290f
> Apr 20 12:30:57.892304 blade0401 osafimmd[1217]: NO First SC IMMND (OpenSAF 
> 4.4 or later) attached 2290f
> Apr 20 12:30:57.892312 blade0401 osafimmd[1217]: NO First IMMND at SC to 
> attach is NOT configured for PBE
> Apr 20 12:30:57.892326 blade0401 osafimmd[1217]: NO First IMMND on SC found 
> at 2290f this IMMD at 2290f. Cluster is loading, *not* 2PBE => designating 
> that IMMND as coordinator
> Apr 20 12:30:57.893706 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO This IMMND is now the 
> NEW Coord
> Apr 20 12:31:00.004735 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO SERVER STATE: 
> IMM_SERVER_CLUSTER_WAITING --> IMM_SERVER_LOADING_PENDING
> Apr 20 12:31:00.105941 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO SERVER STATE: 
> IMM_SERVER_LOADING_PENDING --> IMM_SERVER_LOADING_SERVER
> Apr 20 12:31:00.107076 blade0401 osafimmd[1217]: NO Successfully announced 
> loading. New ruling epoch:1
> Apr 20 12:31:00.107641 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO NODE STATE-> 
> IMM_NODE_LOADING
> Apr 20 12:31:00.209167 blade0401 osafimmloadd[1244]: NO Load starting
> Apr 20 12:31:00.209185 blade0401 osafimmloadd[1244]: NO ***** Loading from 
> XML file imm.xml at /etc/opensaf *****
> Apr 20 12:31:02.051849 blade0401 osafimmloadd[1244]: NO The class OpensafImm 
> has been created since it was missing from the imm.xml load file
> Apr 20 12:31:02.056759 blade0401 osafimmloadd[1244]: IN Class OsafImmPbeRt 
> created
> Apr 20 12:31:02.056769 blade0401 osafimmloadd[1244]: NO The class 
> OsafImmPbeRt has been created since it was missing from the imm.xml load file
> Apr 20 12:31:04.965768 blade0401 osafimmloadd[1244]: NO The 
> opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService object of class OpensafImm has 
> been created since it was missing from the imm.xml load file
> Apr 20 12:31:04.969703 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO Ccb 1 COMMITTED 
> (IMMLOADER)
> Apr 20 12:31:04.975695 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO Closing admin owner 
> IMMLOADER id(1), loading of IMM done
> Apr 20 12:31:04.975706 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO NODE STATE-> 
> IMM_NODE_FULLY_AVAILABLE 2653
> Apr 20 12:31:04.975723 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO RepositoryInitModeT is 
> SA_IMM_INIT_FROM_FILE
> Apr 20 12:31:04.975732 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: WA IMM Access Control mode 
> is DISABLED!
> Apr 20 12:31:04.975740 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO opensafImmNostdFlags 
> changed to: 0x76
> Apr 20 12:31:04.975753 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO Epoch set to 2 in 
> ImmModel
> Apr 20 12:31:04.976986 blade0401 osafimmd[1217]: NO ACT: New Epoch for IMMND 
> process at node 2290f old epoch: 1  new epoch:2
> Apr 20 12:31:04.976994 blade0401 osafimmd[1217]: NO Ruling epoch changed to:2
> Apr 20 12:31:04.979301 blade0401 osafimmloadd[1244]: NO Load ending normally
> Apr 20 12:31:05.025877 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO SERVER STATE: 
> IMM_SERVER_LOADING_SERVER --> IMM_SERVER_READY
> Apr 20 12:31:05.047841 blade0401 osaflogd[1255]: Started
> Apr 20 12:31:05.058340 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO Implementer connected: 1 
> (safLogService) <2, 2290f>
> Apr 20 12:31:05.064572 blade0401 osaflogd[1255]: NO conf_runtime_obj_create: 
> Cannot create config runtime object SA_AIS_ERR_NOT_EXIST (12)
> Apr 20 12:31:05.068103 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'OpenSafLogConfig' is safLogService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:05.081131 blade0401 osaflogd[1255]: NO LOGSV_DATA_GROUPNAME not 
> found
> Apr 20 12:31:05.081158 blade0401 osaflogd[1255]: NO LOG root directory is: 
> "/var/log/opensaf/saflog"
> Apr 20 12:31:05.081164 blade0401 osaflogd[1255]: NO LOG data group is: ""
> Apr 20 12:31:05.083987 blade0401 osaflogd[1255]: NO LGS_MBCSV_VERSION = 5
> Apr 20 12:31:05.114114 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaLogStreamConfig' is safLogService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:05.159160 blade0401 osafntfd[1273]: Started
> Apr 20 12:31:05.205467 blade0401 osafclmd[1290]: Started
> Apr 20 12:31:05.265884 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO Implementer connected: 2 
> (safClmService) <10, 2290f>
> Apr 20 12:31:05.270544 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaClmNode' is safClmService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:05.275181 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaClmCluster' is safClmService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:05.311149 blade0401 osafclmna[1307]: Started
> Apr 20 12:31:05.319041 blade0401 osafclmna[1307]: NO 
> safNode=blade0401,safCluster=myClmCluster Joined cluster, nodeid=2290f
> Apr 20 12:31:05.344301 blade0401 osafamfd[1323]: Started
> Apr 20 12:31:08.350536 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO Implementer connected: 3 
> (safAmfService) <15, 2290f>
> Apr 20 12:31:08.355345 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfCompBaseType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.360071 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSUBaseType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.364744 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSGBaseType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.369454 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfAppBaseType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.374179 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSvcBaseType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.378895 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfCSBaseType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.383574 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfCompGlobalAttributes' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.388294 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfCompType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.393002 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfCSType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.397728 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfCtCsType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.402415 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfHealthcheckType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.407146 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSvcType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.411827 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSvcTypeCSTypes' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.416540 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSUType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.421233 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSutCompType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.425976 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSGType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.430653 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfAppType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.435385 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfCluster' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.440088 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfNode' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.444788 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfNodeGroup' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.449530 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfNodeSwBundle' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.454225 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfApplication' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.458933 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSG' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.463656 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSI' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.468377 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfCSI' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.473117 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfCSIAttribute' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.477838 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSU' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.482553 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfComp' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.487247 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfHealthcheck' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.491970 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfCompCsType' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.496656 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSIDependency' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.501354 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO implementer for class 
> 'SaAmfSIRankedSU' is safAmfService => class extent is safe.
> Apr 20 12:31:08.536907 blade0401 osafamfnd[1340]: Started
> Apr 20 12:31:18.569869 blade0401 osafclmd[1290]: NO Node 141583 went down. 
> Not sending track callback for agents on that node
> Apr 20 12:31:18.575361 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO Implementer locally 
> disconnected. Marking it as doomed 3 <15, 2290f> (safAmfService)
> Apr 20 12:31:18.577132 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO Implementer disconnected 
> 3 <15, 2290f> (safAmfService)
> Apr 20 12:32:25.598467 blade0401 systemd[1]: opensafd.service operation timed 
> out. Terminating.
> Apr 20 12:32:25.598999 blade0401 osafimmd[1217]: exiting for shutdown
> Apr 20 12:32:25.603020 blade0401 opensafd[1120]: Starting OpenSAF Services 
> (Using TIPC):
> Apr 20 12:32:25.600978 blade0401 systemd[1]: Failed to start OpenSAF daemon.
> -- Subject: Unit opensafd.service has failed
> -- Defined-By: systemd
> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> --
> -- Unit opensafd.service has failed.
> --
> -- The result is failed.
> Apr 20 12:32:25.601088 blade0401 systemd[1]: Unit opensafd.service entered 
> failed state.
> Apr 20 12:32:25.603626 blade0401 osafimmnd[1235]: NO Implementer locally 
> disconnected. Marking it as doomed 2 <10, 2290f> (safClmService)
>
>
>
> I have tried this with different 4.7.0 vuild configurations, like:
>
> ./configure --prefix=/home/user/opt/opensaf-4.7.0-tipc --enable-tipc
>
> and
>
> ./configure --prefix=/home/user/opt/opensaf-4.7.0-tipc-no_ais_option 
> --enable-tipc --disable-ais-ckpt --disable-ais-evt --disable-ais-lck 
> --disable-ais-msg --disable-ais-smf --disable-ais-plm 
> --with-rpm-release=timestamp
>
> After configuration I use make and make rpm to build the RPM files, but I 
> need to add this line:
>
> %config /usr/lib/systemd/system/opensafd.service
>
> to the file opensaf.spec at line 947, or else I always get a building error 
> when doing make rpm.
[Praveen] What type of build error you faced?

>
> With the RPMs I install the product in other machine and there is where I get 
> the problem. I follow the same procedure when using TCP (except for 
> --enable-tipc in the configure command) and it works properly.
>
> I have looked in the mailing list for this problem but haven't found 
> anything. I'm using RHELv7.1 64 bits.
>
> Could you help me find the root of this problem?
[Praveen] Please share amfnd and amfd traces by enabling it in 
/etc/opensaf/amfnd.conf and amfd.conf.
Also please refer README wrt systemd for starting opensaf.
>
> Tank you.
>
> [Logo_grupoSepi]José Ángel Rodríguez Rodrigo
> Navantia Sistemas - Systems Infrastructure Team
>
> NAVANTIA (Grupo SEPI)
> Carretera de La Carraca s/n
> 11.100 San Fernando (Cádiz)
>
> Tel.: (+34) 956 59 9900
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> [cid:[email protected]]
>
>
>
>
> NAVANTIA
> ______________________________
> Este mensaje, y cualquier fichero anexo al mismo, contiene informacion de 
> caracter confidencial dirigida exclusivamente a su(s) destinatario(s) y, en 
> su caso, sometida a secreto profesional. Queda prohibida su difusion, copia o 
> distribucion a terceros sin la previa autorizacion escrita. Si Vd. ha 
> recibido este mensaje por error, se ruega lo comunique inmediatamente por 
> esta misma via y proceda a su completa eliminacion.
> The information in this e-mail, and in any attachments, is confidential and, 
> if any, protected by a professional privilege, and intended solely for the 
> attention and use of the named addressee(s). You are hereby notified that any 
> dissemination, copy or distribution of this information is prohibited without 
> the prior written consent. If you have received this communication in error, 
> please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete it.
> ______________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
> Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
> your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
> reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensaf-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users

Reply via email to