Hi Nivrutti,

That’s a typo.
I was trying not to use our real SG names and keep it generic. I meant to 
replace all references to ‘DVN’ with ‘SG-A’.

Thanks,
David


From: Nivrutti Kale [mailto:nk...@brocade.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:38 PM
To: David Hoyt <david.h...@genband.com>; opensaf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: both SUs within a 2N Service Group appear as STANDBY

________________________________
NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender
________________________________

Hi David,

safApp name in two command is not consistent. Are you sure you looking at right 
output?
In the later one safApp name is "safApp=DVN".

Correct State:
safSISU=safSu=SU1\,safSg=SG-A\,safApp=SG-A,safSi=SG-A,safApp=SG-A

Wrong State:
safSISU=safSu=SU2\,safSg=SG-A\,safApp=DVN,safSi=SG-A,safApp=SG-A

Thanks,
Nivrutti

-----Original Message-----
From: David Hoyt [mailto:david.h...@genband.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:46 PM
To: 
opensaf-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:opensaf-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [users] both SUs within a 2N Service Group appear as STANDBY

Hi all,

I'm encountering a scenario where opensaf shows the HA state of both SUs within 
a 2N redundancy Service Group as standby.
Setup:

- Opensaf 4.6 running on RHEL 6.6 VMs with TCP

- 2 controllers, 4 payloads

- SC-1 & SC-2 are the VMs with the controller nodes (SC-1 is active)

- PL-3 & PL4 have SU1 & SU2 from SG-A (2N redundancy)

- PL-5 & PL-6 have SU1 & SU2 from SG-B (2N redundancy)

- Server-1 has three VMs consisting of SC-1, PL-3 and PL-5

- Likewise, server-2 has SC-2, PL-4 and PL-6

I reboot server 1 and shortly afterwards, the SG-A SUs begin to failover. SU2 
on PL-4 goes active.
Around the same time, the opensaf 2N SUs failover.
After the dust has settled, and server-1 comes back as well as the VMs, all 
appears fine except the SG-A SUs. They both have a standby HA state.

Is there any way to correct this?
Is there some audit that periodically checks the validity of the HA states?

Now, when SG-A, SU1 recovers, I did swact the SUs and it corrected the HA 
state. However, if server-1 goes down for an extended period, the HA state of 
SG-A, SU2 will appear as Standby, when it's actually running as active.


Before the reboot:

[root@sc-2 ~]# amf-state siass | grep -A 2 OpenSAF | grep -A 1 safSg=2N 
safSISU=safSu=SC-1\,safSg=2N\,safApp=OpenSAF,safSi=SC-2N,safApp=OpenSAF
saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
--
safSISU=safSu=SC-2\,safSg=2N\,safApp=OpenSAF,safSi=SC-2N,safApp=OpenSAF
saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
[root@jenga-56-sysvm-1 ~]#
[root@sc-2 ~]# amf-state siass | grep -A 1 SG-A 
safSISU=safSu=SU2\,safSg=SG-A\,safApp=SG-A,safSi=SG-A,safApp=SG-A
saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
--
safSISU=safSu=SU1\,safSg=SG-A\,safApp=SG-A,safSi=SG-A,safApp=SG-A
saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
[root@sc-2 ~]#
[root@sc-2 ~]# amf-state siass | grep -A 1 SG-B 
safSISU=safSu=SU2\,safSg=SG-B\,safApp=SG-B,safSi=SG-B,safApp=SG-B
saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
--
safSISU=safSu=SU1\,safSg=SG-B\,safApp=SG-B,safSi=SG-B,safApp=SG-B
saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
[root@sc-2 ~]#



After the reboot:
[root@sc-2 ~]# amf-state siass | grep -A 2 OpenSAF | grep -A 1 safSg=2N 
safSISU=safSu=SC-1\,safSg=2N\,safApp=OpenSAF,safSi=SC-2N,safApp=OpenSAF
saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
--
safSISU=safSu=SC-2\,safSg=2N\,safApp=OpenSAF,safSi=SC-2N,safApp=OpenSAF
saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
[root@sc-2 ~]#
[root@sc-2 ~]# amf-state siass | grep -A 1 SG-A 
safSISU=safSu=SU1\,safSg=SG-A\,safApp=SG-A,safSi=SG-A,safApp=SG-A
saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
--
safSISU=safSu=SU2\,safSg=SG-A\,safApp=DVN,safSi=SG-A,safApp=SG-A
saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
[root@sc-2 ~]#
[root@sc-2 ~]# amf-state siass | grep -A 1 SG-B 
safSISU=safSu=SU2\,safSg=SG-B\,safApp=SG-B,safSi=SG-B,safApp=SG-B
saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
--
safSISU=safSu=SU1\,safSg=SG-B\,safApp=SG-B,safSi=SG-B,safApp=SG-B
saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
[root@sc-2 ~]#

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech 
sites, SlashDot.org! 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sdm.link_slashdot&d=DQICAg&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=8oj2Tn7_JuMy90N67rXExkWsx29-JTWbXUkT3IIi99w&m=BaG3BbO8jb9Kb25-YUeviPLDBOneLUA9eCdRL_aGGCY&s=w8V8KD0t_dVvVP5_XfZyk-p6mEg5GVrYRPepDNhx6NA&e=
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-users mailing list
Opensaf-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Opensaf-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.sourceforge.net_lists_listinfo_opensaf-2Dusers&d=DQICAg&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=8oj2Tn7_JuMy90N67rXExkWsx29-JTWbXUkT3IIi99w&m=BaG3BbO8jb9Kb25-YUeviPLDBOneLUA9eCdRL_aGGCY&s=gnAd8SOolRZjOJpW5NKwOr8soOHd7vXnsrQWa5xpSWk&e=
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-users mailing list
Opensaf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users

Reply via email to