On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2007-December/010617.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r3304 | ludovic.rousseau | 2007-12-17 15:39:20 +0200 (Mon, 17 Dec > 2007) | 5 lines > > add support of ruToken > > Thanks to Andrew V. Stepanov for the patch > > http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2007-December/010617.html > > > The above updated the pkcs11.h file which maintained at different > upstream. It is not wise to fork this as we will not be able to sync. > > I found it due to invalid C++ comment :) > > Why is this needed? > Can it be placed in vendor specific file? > Why don't the new constant has ruToken prefix?
According to http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/changeset/3304 the file trunk/src/pkcs11/pkcs11.h was modified to add: //rutoken: #define CKK_GOST (CKK_VENDOR_DEFINED+1) #define CKA_GOST CKA_VENDOR_DEFINED+1 #define CKM_GOST CKM_VENDOR_DEFINED+1 I also agree this "standard" file should not be modified. I overlooked the changes when I made the commit. What would be the correct way to have these defines? Bye -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
