On 29.12.2008, at 20:48, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 12/29/08, Martin Paljak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 27.12.2008, at 22:18, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> >> >>> Until we do so, the PKCS#11 provider is *NOT* compliant with the >> specification. >>> >> >> Please elaborate? > > The PKCS#11 specification does not limit concurrent application access > to single token in any point in time. > The lock term was introduced by OpenSC due to implementation choice. At the same time, I see no line in the spec forbidding such implementation choices, which is a totally valid tunable together with pcsc options (for example, exclusive connect would result in almost similar behavior than pkcs11 locking). Which makes most sense to any given person, is a different story.
m. -- Martin Paljak http://martin.paljak.pri.ee +372.515.6495 _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
