2009/9/21 Andreas Jellinghaus <a...@dungeon.inka.de>: > Am Sonntag 20 September 2009 17:25:59 schrieb Martin Paljak: >> Hmm, that is an interesting idea. It would also have to include scconf >> which currently is distributed separately, but then again is also used >> by other software like pam_pkcs11 for example. > > yes, but don't they use a copy of the code or something? > oops, I wasn't aware we had libscconf.so.2 as standalone library. > hmm, not sure what is best for pam_pkcs11, but if there is only > one other user, why don't we make it internal too?
pam_pkcs11 has its own copy of the scconf source code (with some minor differences). pam_pkcs11 does not use a libscconf.so.2 library. Bye -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
