1. For starters, we should rename the "main slogan" of OpenSC to  
something that's more up to date. The "supported cards" list could  
either be generalized or at least updated: 
http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/opensc
2. Keep the main name OpenSC. This includes any binary installers,  
which we should provide, if possible, to those who are used to binary  
installers (Windows, OS X). This also means getting rid of SCA/SCB.
3. Keep OpenSC core platform-agnostic: OpenSC.tokend lives outside of  
the (lib)opensc package, so should the possible future MS BaseCSP  
piece, which is in nature similar to the tokend. The only cross- 
platform "public interface" is PKCS#11. OpenSC *installers* for those  
platforms, on the other hand, must contain those components. This  
means getting rid of SCA/SCB, providing OpenSC installers for Mac and  
Windows and either providing the separate user software as extra  
downloadables or work with other software providers to add support for  
OpenSC/PKCS#11. This is way easier if OpenSC declares somewhere what  
it installs, where and why, instead of providing kitchen-sink  
installers that try to do everything.


m.

On 20.10.2009, at 16:10, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:

> the current entries are
>       opensc  openct
>       scb             pam_pkcs11
>       sca             pam_p11
>       engine_pkcs11   libp11
>       gtkcard                 opensc-java
>       pkcs11-helper   opensc build
>
> shouldn't we reorder this?
>       * scb is outdated, lets move it last, as noone
>         should use it any more. maybe with an extra
>         obsoleted / closed / ... projects header?
>       * is gtkcard any use? I guess not, so lets
>         move it last too.
>
> maybe something like?
>       opensc                  openct
>       apple (sca)             windows (build)
>       pam_pkcs11              pam_p11
>       engine_pkcs11   libp11
>       pkcs11-helper   opensc-java
>       gtkcard (with warning: testing only)
>       scb (with warning: outdated and insecure)
>
> or some other order? I used to add new projects
> to the buttom, but now several of the new projects
> are much more important than some of the old, so we
> should reflect that on the home page I guess. what
> is the best way to find a fair solution?
>
> Regards, Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> opensc-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

-- 
Martin Paljak
http://martin.paljak.pri.ee
+372.515.6495




_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to