Am Samstag 24 Oktober 2009 06:33:36 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev: > I did. > As I wrote, if upstream have parameter to customize and provide > whatever needed downstream no change is required upstream.
true, we don't need to change our code if people can customize these things. but why would we want a a default that will cause problems on typical installations? I think that is a bad idea, opensc should not try to use pcsc via a name that is only resolved if the development package is installed. Thus I think the change should be kept, and it is actually an improvement. also I don't want to role -rc3 for an issue like that - people can fix it with configure flags, if they prefer "libpcsclite.so" over "libpcsclite.so.1" for some reason. but maybe I missed something, and there is a drawback to using that name, that I didn't see? Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
