On 02.11.2009, at 19:08, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > yes and no. ctapi is always compiled in, so we should allow that > case. but we can still have a big fat warning if neither openct > nor pcsc is compiled in.
Yes, but *why*? I don't see a good reason for this other than pure legacy. CT-API requires manual configuration in the form of a module definition, much like current PC/SC implementation (if there was not a single, predictable default). CT-API should as well be made optional. Especially because it is not used that much. -- Martin Paljak http://martin.paljak.pri.ee +372.515.6495 _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
