Am Dienstag 03 November 2009 13:41:07 schrieb Viktor TARASOV:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to update the support of the Oberthur card
> and to implement the PIN unblocking style of the Oberthur's native
> middleware.
> 
> For the Oberthur card a PIN is some internal object (it's not like a SDO
> object)
> and the ACLs for the PIN operations ('RESET', 'CHANGE' and 'DEFINE')
> are included into the ACLs of the parent DF.
> 
> So, my question is.
> Will it be acceptable to introduce some new SC_AC_OP_ types
> to make possible the control of these ACLs by the card profile?

sorry, not much clue here how opensc works with acls.

when you create / set ACL on a DF, you need to know both the
settings for the DF itself, as well for embedded objects?
so you need extra flags passed down the chain to handle those?

or can you create the DF firsth with conserative settings,
and have a second funciton call to update it to set the
values for the embedded objects?

how do other cards work? I guess the df is created with
df acl passed to it, and the pin is created with pin acl
passed down the function chain?

Regards, Andreas
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to