Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > we could drop all certificates and issue username/password for each > developer instead.
That would be the ultimate irony! Not even the developers can make the thing work. Martin Paljak wrote: > > yes, we could switch to ssh instead of http for write access. > > > > if we do that, we could as well switch from svn to git (or other > > system. but martin is a git fan and so am I) if we want. git has > > "gitossis" which is a secure shell for fine grained access > > control to git repositories (and allowes nothing else). I can also recommend git-shell and simply handling repository access with unix users, groups and ACLs. > > throw away trac too. Agree with Martin that Trac is nice to have. > Trac works very well if you use SVN. There is a git plugin too, but > it "feels" strange. But it works. I'm running this at http://libusb.org/ > > and the trac ticket system is bad, as we don't get an email of a > > bug reporter, This is configurable. Email validation can be required before users are allowed to change content in wiki and tickets. Combined with OpenID it's actually an incredibly simple to manage _and_ simple to use system. > Bold text "If you want the issue fixed, leave an e-mail address or > check back here" added to the new ticket screen would help remedy > this situation. Also a good idea. //Peter _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
