Am Montag 01 März 2010 17:02:29 schrieb Viktor TARASOV: > Finally, > if you tell that somebody uses the multi-pin-domains with the 'flex' card, > there is no choice, we need to keep it.
not sure. but I think people tried to create several pins with different keys/certificates assigned to them. maybe it is not bad if that no longer works with cryptoflex. but isn't it likely someone else might want to try that again in the future, maybe with some other driver, but still? last time I looked at eid cards, the ones I saw in germany often have three rsa keys - lawfull signature, authentication, email decryption, and different pins for them (although I think only two pins - one for lawfull signatures, and one for authentication/decryption). so it might be a good idea if opensc could be used to configure cards to mimik that. not terrible important, but if the "pin-domain" infrastructure helps with such setups, it might be nice. on the other hand I also agree that code that isn't used except by one card, and that card is old and no longer sold, and even users of that card are unlikely to have ever used that feature, then such code should propably be removed in favor of smaller, better to maintain and understandable code base. so I don't know what is best either. I leave the decission to you, as you know the code etc. best. Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
