Hi Viktor,

Am Freitag 19 März 2010 15:10:29 schrieb Viktor TARASOV:
> I would like to start to submit the support for the cards IAS/ECC as it
> defined in 'Gixel' specification [1] .
> File system of this card is based on PKCS#15.

good idea! go for it!:)
>
> This support should include multi-applications, secure messaging (SM),
> external authentication (EA), qualified signature, ...
> 
> Support of SM and EA will be implemented as a loadable module . This
> module, relatively small, will have different versions. 'Local' version
> will have direct access to the SM or EA key-sets and is used mostly for
> tests.
> 'Distant' version should communicate with some distant entity that is
> able to 'securize' the APDUs or to generate secured APDUs . This
> solution we are currently using in our PKI&SCM projects .


will you publish both? I'm interested in both ways, too.
maybe we could compile in the simple version, so the users don't need
additional libs/plugins to make the card work, but allow an additional
module to take precedence.

> First one is to create some sub-project or brunch, forked from the
> current trunk. Here we'll have possibility to finalize the basic
> architecture features in inoffensive for the main brunch manner . I
> cannot estimate how much efforts is needed to support one more
> sub-project, and so, don't know if it's acceptable.
> 
> Second is to start the integration into the main trunk. It will be
> rather slow and somewhere 'painful' way. But it will not need the
> support of another brunch/sub-project . I don't know what is the release
> roadmap, but if that is 'the road we take', I guess it would be safe to
> fix the actual state of trunk with the next (major ?) release .

both is fine with me.

if you want to evaluate a software that might help you:
git for example has much better merge support than svn, as far as I know.
and it provides a bridge to svn, so you can import svn in a git, then work
in git, and push commits back into git (both branches and trunk). 
(hg or bzr might work as well, I think all of them have such svn bridges...)

Regards, Andreas
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to