Hello, > Unless somebody has comments or corrections, they'll be merged. The only > problematic ticket is #177 which is actually a set of patches (that need > manual merging for now) and that adds a major feature, secure messaging.
My bad. Been meaning to tackle that for more than a year (and I didn't follow up privately with you on that – writing it here just to acknowledge that I *did* promise to work on it, but didn't do it :) ) > Basically there's a mini-fork on http://itacns.corp.it/browser (requires > registration) that should be eliminated better now than never. Agreed. > Viktor, you had plans with secure messaging as well, I know that this > specific implementation (it reads keys from a config file or environment, > IIRC) is not what you have in mind, as it should also support remote tunnels. > Can you have a look and see if: > a) parts of it can be integrated anyway > b) some of the code could be re-used for a better SM implementation > c) some parts of the design can be upgraded on the way I'm more than willing to collaborate on this. Thanks :) -- Emanuele _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
