Hello, On Aug 8, 2010, at 9:50 PM, Emanuele Pucciarelli wrote:
> Hello, > > it seems to me that ACL handling in opensc-explorer is wrong. It > assumes SC_AC_OP_* flags are numbered in the same order as in > opensc-explorer.c:436 (used to display DF ACLs), which is correct. But > then, a few lines later, it employs a different label list for EF > ACLs, which IMHO is wrong. I made this tiny patch – do you think it's > all right? Yes, it seems right. It might even make sense to explicitly use ACL symbols for DF as well. -- Martin Paljak @martinpaljak.net +3725156495 _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
