As mentioned, computing the last round of the hash on the device and
the previous rounds in software would be the perfect thing to have.
Is it ok if I try to implement this for libp11 and submit the solution
for review? If the solution is accepted I could then move on to
integrate this feature into enginePkcs11!

Best regards,
Martin

2010/10/19 Viktor TARASOV <viktor.tara...@opentrust.com>:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> 2010/10/19 Martin Paljak <mar...@paljak.pri.ee>:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 13:38, Martin Boßlet
>>> <martin.boss...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I noticed that libp11 (and enginePkcs11, too) only allows to create
>>>> signatures where the hash was computed in software. The PKCS#11 device
>>>> will simply apply the signature algorithm, and the PKCS#1.5 padding is
>>>> created manually. But many devices actually provide support for
>>>> performing the whole procedure on the device (i.e. hashing, signature
>>>> and padding). Some people even consider it a security risk if not the
>>>> entire procedure takes place on the device (tbd). Regardless of that,
>>>> wouldn't it be a nice addition to add support for this in both
>>>> libraries?
>>>> I'd be glad to help out myself, is it possible to contribute?
>>>>
>>> Of course [1] !
>>>
>>> The reason why hashing is usually done on the host side is speed.
>>> Documents I usually sign are around 100K or even bigger and the smart
>>> card reader interface is not the fastest on earth.
>>>
>>
>> Note: I have not checked the OpenSC or libp11 implementation.
>> A good compromise is to compute the hash value on the host (for speed)
>> except the last round. The last hash round is computed inside the card
>> just before the padding and signature.
>> With that scheme you have both speed and security.
>>
> For some cards, like IAS/ECC, it's the only possible procedure for PSO_CDS.
>
>> Bye
>>
>>
>>> [1] http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/GetInvolved
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Viktor Tarasov  <viktor.tara...@opentrust.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> opensc-devel mailing list
> opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to