Excellent! From my standpoint it is OK to commit.  

Thanks for your efforts!

Brian Thomas

-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas E. Engert [mailto:deeng...@anl.gov] 
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 1:45 PM
To: opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org; Brian Thomas; Martin Paljak
Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Proposed cardmod patch

Attached is the patch to just do (2) below. I believe that this is the part 
that Brian wants to not call sc_ctx_detect_readers Martin you had said you want 
to do this differently so I will leave this up to you as to weither this is 
commited or not.



On 1/19/2011 5:46 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
> Attached is a patch to the cardmod code to do the following:
>
> (1) Fix an uninitialized stricture by by using calloc in stead of 
> malloc. With out this it was having problems with checking the status 
> on the reader.
>
> (2) Implement a change that this should work for Brian Thomas that 
> allows one to not detect the reader when creating the sc_context. This 
> uses the SC_CONTEXT_PARAM_DONT_DETECT_READERS flag in the ctx_params
>
> (The more I think about this, this should be the default to not detect 
> the readers during the sc_create_ctx, as a flag on opensc.conf could 
> control this instead.)
>
> (3) Eliminate the storing of the SCARDCONTEXT and SCARDHANDLE in the 
> registry. Instead, cardmod.c will store them in its VENDOR_SCPECIFIC 
> structure, call sc_context_create with the 
> SC_CONTEXT_PARAM_DONT_DETECT_READERS flag set in the ctx_params. It 
> will then modify the ctx, and then call sc_ctx_detect_readers that 
> will call the cardmod code in reader-pcsc.c that will use the 
> SCARDCONTEXT and SCARDHANDLE.
>
> I can get this to work in Vista with certutil -SCinfo, but there is 
> some issue as is says it can not open the key. I think this is an 
> issue with using a 39 character key container name and a constant for 
> a serial number.
>
> It does not work with login or runas. This may be the same issue with 
> after reading the certificate, it is not registering the container so 
> it can be used later.
>
> The patch is against 0.12.0. and was built on Ubuntu.
>
> I would hope Brian and François could look this over to see if it 
> should be committed.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> opensc-devel mailing list
> opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

-- 

  Douglas E. Engert  <deeng...@anl.gov>
  Argonne National Laboratory
  9700 South Cass Avenue
  Argonne, Illinois  60439
  (630) 252-5444
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to