On 6/6/2011 7:19 AM, Martin Paljak wrote:
>
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 15:01 , Viktor Tarasov wrote:
>
>> Le 06/06/2011 11:22, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> Just a quick notice that a section about "certificate compatibility"
>>> seems justified somewhere in documentation.
>>
>> Yes, it would be very useful.
>> I imagine that subtle expert knowledge of the subject is needed, for example 
>> when it's going about BaseCSP, minidriver, SmartcardLogon, ...
> Maybe we can re-use the knowledge of EJBCA folks here, maybe their 
> documentation even already includes necessary bits and pieces of information, 
> I have not checked. Also PKIX docs are useful, but to get certificates 
> "right" requires some time and effort. That's why setting up a really CA is 
> not the same as running some OpenSSL commands... Root key secrecy, policies, 
> certificate profiles etc require a lot of work to get right for a setup.
>

What is in a certificate is not really OpenSC's concern,
but the concern of the CA, and since we are talking login,
and usually to Windows AD the concern of the DC or Kerberos
KDC administrators.

This is a good starting point:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281245

Or:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/shivaram/

Google for: AD smartcard login

Under the covers, AD is using the Kerberos PKINIT protocol,
so much of this applies to Linux with pam_krb5 to AD or
to a MIT or Heimdal KDC, and krb5.conf has many parameters
used by the PKINIT code.

Google for: pam_krb5 PKINIT


>
> Cheers,
> Martin

-- 

  Douglas E. Engert  <deeng...@anl.gov>
  Argonne National Laboratory
  9700 South Cass Avenue
  Argonne, Illinois  60439
  (630) 252-5444
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to