On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 17:01 +0300, Martin Paljak wrote: > Hello, > On Jun 8, 2011, at 16:50 , Andre Zepezauer wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote: > >> On 06/07/2011 03:17 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote: > >>> Hello Jean-Pierre, > >>> > >>> SC_PKCS15_PIN_FLAG_VERIFY_RC_COUNTER doesn't correspond to any flag > >>> defined in PKCS#15. Furthermore, the capability to modify the return > >>> code of the VERIFY command is not specific to PKCS#15. > >>> > >>> Why not using a different approach? In example it's possible to detect > >>> the installed packages of CardOS. Depending of the presence of the > >>> "Verify Retry Counter Package" the flags in TEST BSO could be set > >>> accordingly. > >>> > >> Hi Andre, > >> > >> Any comment/objection? > > > > A flag SC_CARD_FLAG_ISO_VERIFY would be of general use. If set, then > > it's possible to send the VERIFY command with *empty* data field to get > > the number of further allowed retries coded in SW '63CX'. > > > > That means, that cardos_have_verifyrc_package would be placed better in > > card-cardos.c and only "card->flags & SC_CARD_FLAG_ISO_VERIFY" needs to > > be checked in pkcs15-cardos.c > > > > Prerequisite is that opensc-tool -s "00 20 00 01" returns something > > like: Received (SW1=0x63, SW2=0xC3) > > > > Any comment/objection? > > More elegant indeed. Some nice documentation about the real meaning of the > flag would also be nice. "most cards do almost ISO" to support pinpads. > But not all support the status query...
Maybe I'm wrong, but IMO Viktor had implemented the status query through empty data field some time ago. So, there would be at least two cards which does support it. _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
