Le 09/09/2011 11:22, Martin Paljak a écrit : > On 09/09/11 11:32, Viktor Tarasov wrote: >> Le 09/09/2011 10:09, Martin Paljak a écrit : >>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:39, Viktor >>> Tarasov<viktor.tara...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Le 09/09/2011 09:23, Martin Paljak a écrit : >>>>> If we omit loadable modules, we could also take that ATR tables are >>>>> indeed static and do not need to be released? Is this correct? >>>> Exact. >>>> Only loadable module prevents the static ATR tables. >>> Then the solution is IMHO simple. >>> >>> AFAIK only one proprietary (which does not work with 0.12 IIRC, the >>> troubled DNIe binary module) exists in the wild at the moment and I >>> don't think we should bolster piggybacking on OpenSC for this purpose. >> Fine, >> and to continue this movement, could we envisage the abandon of support >> of the obsolete cards ? > As you are also the original code author, you should be the best to > judge what is relevant and what not.
Finally I roll back this proposal -- there has been a voice in defense of the 'oberthur' driver. >> Example, 'oberthur' driver supports the old v.2.xx of the 'AuthentIC' >> PKI applet with the proprietary file system. >> This card is not more produced. >> The new 3.2 version of this applet, compatible with PKCS#15, is >> actually supported by 'authentic' card driver. > If there are cards out there and there is not much needed to maintain > the current driver as a working entity, I would not rush to remove it > ASAP. Maybe a forward notice would do good and the code can rotten there > with the intent of being removed in X months ? > > > Martin > _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
