Le mardi 20 mars 2012 à 22:16 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit : > > I think that core developers (and I am not arguing I am one of them) > should have free access to repository, allowing them to progress the > fastest they can, we (the community) should trust them to fix whatever > issue they may cause, post review their changes and suggest > alternatives.
Thanks for this post.
OpenSC is really a small community relying on trust and it should be
"self-managed".
Now, IMHO:
Martin and Ludovic, can you open the door to a real collaboration and
allow more core developers? As OpenSC is a small community I think it is
preferable to come back to the old organization when the community was
driving itself.
Martin and Ludovic, please confirm on the mailing list each of these:
A. OpenSC is a self driven-community with several core-developers, no
leader/owner.
B. Martin and Ludovic are core developers, not owners of the project.
OpenSC is owned by the community.
Without direct answer, I will be obliged to incorporate a public OpenSC
association in France and ask core developers to join the association.
Kind regards,
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
