On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote:
>> progress much faster, even in the price of committing not-the-best >> solutions, > Do you find this a desirable quality for a security-related project? I don't think that this thread was about a balance of quality against quantity. The issue was that the selected reviewing process was inefficient and became a bottleneck to adding any new features. Having code lying for several months unreviewed doesn't really improve quality, it just demotivates contributors. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
