Hi Johannes,

Johannes Behr wrote:
> Well, some "old" programs are quite big and cannot ported easily
> to 2.0, especially since 2.0 is still a moving target. We cannot
> force the developer to use 2.0 right now. Some would like
> to use 2.0 as basis to try new things and some
> would like to stay with a stable version.
>   
No, nobody's thinking about forcing people to 2.
> I really would love to see some features in 1.8 (and 2.0)
> that helps us (and other OpenSG user) to keep the number
> of #ifdefs as low as possible.
> We really would like to keep a single branch that compiles on 1.8 and  
> 2.0.
>   
Hm, I don't know if that's a sensible goal. My idea was that people 
should stay on 1.X until 2.x has acceptable stability and then port, and 
making that port quick and as painless as possible. Being able to use 
both will make the program complicated.
> Maybe we can introduce those extra functions after the 1.8 release.
>   
I'm a little weary about spending tim eon adding 2.0 stuff to 1.8 
instead of spending time on actually developing 2.0...

    Dirk


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core

Reply via email to