Hi Carsten, > Hi Andreas, > > Andreas Zieringer wrote: > >>Hi Carsten, >> >>this hack was necessary to load old 1.x osb files. In 1.x the >>MaterialChunk has a internal field, not sure about 2.0 but I think there >>is no "real" internal field anymore. > > > hm, I just looked through CVS history but could not find such a field in > OSGMaterialChunkBase.h, but I guess I'll just leave the hack in.
yes this field exists in every StateChunk I think it comes from the Attachment class. > Something different on NFIO: > There is the postProcess operation that seems to do some conversions >>from old formats and apparently is allowed to delete FCs along the way. > Now, my question is: shouldn't this happen *before* calling > chargeFieldPtr and update the id map correspondingly ? well I'm not sure if this works but right now it works fine and it is safe because I use the fieldcontainer id's and not the pointers. There is a comment in OSGNFIOBase.cpp line 279 Andreas > Thanks, > Carsten > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Opensg-core mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Opensg-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
