Hi,

Allen Bierbaum wrote:
> Gerrit Voss wrote:
>> For example some of the stuff in SConstruct (roughly up to line 500)
>> should be in scons-addons (from an OpenSG only perspective). So it is
>> reusable for people who want to write their own applications.
>>   
> I agree there is a lot of utility code in there.  I am not sure if it 
> all makes sense in scons-addons (some of it does), but the OpenSG part 
> IMHO should actually be put into some utility libraries in 
> OpenSG2/Tools/scons-build  where the LibraryUtils module currently is.  

I had a patch for this, but before I had a chance to convince myself
that it completely works, there were changes to SConstruct that
diff/patch were unable to merge in and simply concatenated both variants
of the file :(
Anyway, I'll recreate that patch ASAP.


        Carsten

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core

Reply via email to