Hi All,
the Wiki seems to be up to me, can you try again?
Carsten Neumann wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> jan p. springer wrote:
>> Carsten Neumann said the following on 04/18/07 13:14:
>>> Hi,
>> [ snip]
>>> I intend to come up with a scheme for where
>>> For prebuilt RPMs <prefix> := /usr/local
>> why not /opt or /usr? rpms are intended for system install afaict
>> so /usr would be the right place.
>
> /usr should IMHO be reserved for packages that are part of a
> distribution and I did not really aim for inclusion into distros, just
> for a convenient way to grab one/some RPMs, install them and be ready to
> run examples.
> Anyway, I would not object to using /opt instead, but be less happy
> about /usr.
One goal of having RPMs is to get into the distros, so we might need to take a
look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines to see if we're
clashing with their requirements. A quick check didn't show anything major.
>>> osg-config
>>> <prefix>/bin
>> would this be also the place for binaries from Tools?
>
> yes, I think so. Maybe we should add a "osg-" or even "opensg-" prefix
> to the names of the binaries ?
Good idea. Should we move to opensg- to avoid conflicts with 'the other
scenegraph'? I don't think they have a -config script right now, but they might
in the future.
> scons-addons and scons-build would end up
> in <prefix>/share/OpenSG/scons-addons and
> <prefix>/share/OpenSG/scons-build respectively.
OK.
>>> debug libs
>>> <prefix>/lib/OpenSG/dbg
>>> optimized libs
>>> <prefix>/lib/OpenSG/opt
>>> symbolic links in
>>> <prefix>/lib/ to the libs in <prefix>/lib/OpenSG/opt
>> are the libraries going to have version suffixes? if so, you also need
>> links to the generic lib<name>.so.
>
> Good point. Is this the usual practice on RPM using distros (I'm using
> debian myself, so I'd need some input here) ?
See the Wiki.
>>> headers
>>> <prefix>/include/OpenSG
>>>
>>> doxygen documentation
>>> <prefix>/share/OpenSG/doc
>> not knowing the lsb specs but shouldn't this be
>> <prefix>/share/doc/OpenSG-<version>?
>> [ snip ]
>
> I've looked at the FHS (<http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html>),
> but I can not read a definite statement either way from it. What is the
> practice used by fedora, opensuse, mandriva ?
Looking at my FC5 box it looks like <prefix>/share/OpenSG for components and
<prefix>/share/doc/OpenSG-<version> for documentation/examples.
Thanks
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
